Re: CVE-2023-46604 distribution

2023-11-13 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Hi, The fix is actually in activemq-client (which the broker uses too), so I suspect that is the artifact that is tagged. Have a look at https://central.sonatype.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/activemq-client/versions and see if that helps. Jon On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 3:11 PM Wim van Ravesteij

Re: ActiveMQ 5.15 vs 5.16 behaviour on durable topics

2022-04-26 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
> Bart van Leeuwen > > > twitter: @semanticfire > tel. +31(0)6-53182997 > Netage B.V. > *http://netage.nl* <http://netage.nl/> > Esdoornstraat 3 > 3461ER Linschoten > The Netherlands > > > > > From:"Jonathan Gallimore" >

Re: ActiveMQ 5.15 vs 5.16 behaviour on durable topics

2022-04-26 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Thanks Jon On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 4:39 PM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Apache TomEE contributor here :) > > Just a heads-up that I'm looking at this on the TomEE side as well. I > recall that there were a couple of changes on the Tom

Re: ActiveMQ 5.15 vs 5.16 behaviour on durable topics

2022-04-26 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Hi, Apache TomEE contributor here :) Just a heads-up that I'm looking at this on the TomEE side as well. I recall that there were a couple of changes on the TomEE side around the time we picked up ActiveMQ 5.16.x, so its worth us checking that there isn't an issue there. Thanks for your reproduce

Re: Release date for ActiveMQ v5.16.2 to fix CVEs

2021-04-27 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
an additional binding vote is still required... > > Best regards, > Simon. > > > > > On 27 Apr 2021, at 09:42, Jonathan Gallimore <mailto:jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > ActiveMQ 5.16.2 is being voted on at the moment > >

Re: Release date for ActiveMQ v5.16.2 to fix CVEs

2021-04-27 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Hi, ActiveMQ 5.16.2 is being voted on at the moment: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5b0094d52e4b43f60d3434ff20d3525290bf34bd85ff90af0b152aba%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E, once that vote is complete, the binaries will be released on the website. You can pick up the binaries that are being

Re: Is it possible to limit the storage in ActiveMQ ?

2020-03-02 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
I don't know if you can specify the store size via the URL - I suspect not. You can provide an activemq.xml config file for ActiveMQ running in TomEE - high level instructions are here: https://tomee.apache.org/latest/docs/jms-resources-and-mdb-container.html - see the "Internal ActiveMQ Broker wit

Re: Artemis JMX connection

2020-02-26 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
//github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/examples/features/standard/jmx/pom.xml#L64 > [2] > > http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/management.html#configuring-remote-jmx-access > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:23 AM Jonathan Gallimore < > j

Artemis JMX connection

2020-02-26 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Hi folks Apologies for a rookie question... I have Artemis setup on my local machine, and have enabled the JMX connector in management.xml: I don't seem to be able to connect to service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/jmxrmi. I've tried looking at the jmx example and adding a guest role -

Re: Issue with ActiveMQ/JMS 2.0

2020-02-10 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
I notice you're using TomEE, and asked on the TomEE mailing list. TomEE uses ActiveMQ 5, and provides a bridge for the JMS 2.0 functionality you're using. The issue is more likely on the TomEE side, and I'll follow up there. Jon On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:11 AM COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta

Re: ActiveMQ deployed in TOMEE as a service

2019-09-02 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Awesome, glad it's working! Thanks for the follow up! Jon On Mon, 2 Sep 2019, 16:16 Beckly, wrote: > Thanks! WorkingDirectory has resolve my issue. Had to edit a couple more > files which made reference to the activemq.xml and activemq.properties > files > but seems good! > > > > -- > Sent f

Re: ActiveMQ deployed in TOMEE as a service

2019-09-02 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Can you share /etc/systemd/system/tomee.service with us? Off the top of my head, it sounds like you might need to set a WorkingDirectory parameter in that systemd unit. Thanks Jon On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 2:38 PM Beckly wrote: > I have got ActiveMQ deployed within TOMEE. This works fine and Act

Re: TomEE embedded ActiveMQ + Injected JMSContext -> Abandoned Connections

2019-04-04 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
setDeliveryMode(DeliveryMode.PERSISTENT). > send(localQueue, > textMessage); > } > catch (JMSException e) > { > e.printStackTrace(); > } > } > } >

Re: TomEE embedded ActiveMQ + Injected JMSContext -> Abandoned Connections

2019-04-03 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Sounds like an issue we need to look at on the TomEE side (adding us...@tomee.apache.org) What are you injecting into - an EJB or CDI bean? Your code shows a consumer - how are you sending your messages? Jon On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, 19:43 tkspradley, wrote: > First posting here. Please let me know

Re: Has anyone connected ActiveMQ to Active Directory?

2018-05-09 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Hi Mike I don't know if it'll help, but here is my working config from a test server with both Active Directory and ActiveMQ running on the same server: activemq { org.apache.activemq.jaas.LDAPLoginModule required debug=true initialContextFactory=com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory c

Re: Has anyone connected ActiveMQ to Active Directory?

2018-05-02 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
I'm currently doing the same thing in ActiveMQ 5.15.2. Can you set the level for "org.apache.activemq.artemis.spi.core.security.jaas" to debug/trace to get the information you're after? Jon On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:26 PM, mtod wrote: > Would you happen to know how yo log the LDAP calls to assi

RE: JMS messages replication

2018-01-26 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Hey Francois, I have successfully managed to get TomEE going with Artemis, but it isn't very user friendly, and I'm sure the integration could be better. If you're up for some hacking on that, let me know and I'd be happy to give you some pointers. Cheers Jon On 26 Jan 2018 17:29, "COURTAULT F

Re: Anyone have Artemis working with Apache TomEE?

2017-08-02 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
#x27;ll take a look at the CLI code tomorrow evening. Looking forward to working on that and collaborating with you. Cheers, Jon On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > If you give me some pointers on what is needed to run Tomee with Artemis? > > On Wed, Aug 2,

Re: Anyone have Artemis working with Apache TomEE?

2017-08-02 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
JIRA opened: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1321. That commit should be updated now - hope its all ok. Many thanks for this! Jon On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure thing - I'll do that JIRA now and make

Re: Anyone have Artemis working with Apache TomEE?

2017-08-02 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Sure thing - I'll do that JIRA now and make the change. I haven't done much with the CLI (just created a broker really), but I'd love to help out with that. I can dig in later this week. No doubt I'll have some questions, I'll come back with those once I've taken an initial look. Cheers Jon On W