rise-activemq/#documentation
>
> Also see the persistence guide which has a full chapter on message cursors
> http://fusesource.com/docs/broker/5.5/persistence/index.html
>
>
> Hope this helps,
>
>
>
> Torsten Mielke
> tors...@fusesource.com
> tmie...@blogsp
Near the bottom of this page
http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html it shows:
Disabling Flow Control
A common requirement is to disable flow control so that message dispatching
continues until all available disk is used up by pending messages (whether
persistent or non persisten
This might help, we are using something similar to this to install new trust
certificates dynamically into ssl context used by activemq.
http://jcalcote.wordpress.com/2010/06/22/managing-a-dynamic-java-trust-store/
--jason
On Jan 23, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> t
n for DLQ delivery?
Something like a "dlqDeliveryReason" which could be "expired" or "failure" and
on "failure" you can go look at "dlqDeliveryFailureCause" for more detail.
Are there any other reasons why a message might be sent to the DLQ?
--
n 20, 2012, at 2:20 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
> org.apache.activemq.broker.region.virtual.VirtualTopicInterceptor#send
>
> which calls: org.apache.activemq.broker.region.DestinationFilter#send
>
> On 20 January 2012 01:48, Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Can you point me at the c
re/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/MessageListenerRedeliveryTest.java?r1=1084175&r2=1084174&pathrev=1084175
>
> On 19 January 2012 19:09, Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Is this change in 5.5.1 and enabled by default?
>>
>> If so I don't see any of these properti
rg/jira/browse/AMQ-3236 and the associated
> commits. We may be able to build on that.
>
> On 19 January 2012 05:58, Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Is there any easy way to get information about why a message had been sent
>> to ActiveMQ.DLQ?
>>
>> I'm seeing a bunch
Is there any easy way to get information about why a message had been sent to
ActiveMQ.DLQ?
I'm seeing a bunch of messages sent to a virtual topic (as indicated by
OriginalDestination property while browsing the ActiveMQ.DLQ via visualvm,
which end up in the DLQ. Really unsure why any message
test.>" or "test.*" matches "test.example"?
--jason
On Jan 16, 2012, at 5:18 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
> they don't aggregate. There is an best match, and the default takes
> the unmatched case.
>
> On 16 January 2012 03:28, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
On Jan 15, 2012, at 6:38 PM, SuoNayi wrote:
> The last policy will be applied.
Um, this doesn't really answer the question I asked...
What does "last" mean in this context?
:-\
--jason
> At 2012-01-16 04:01:00,"Jason Dillon" wrote:
>> I'm w
I'm wondering if destination policy map entries aggregate configuration?
For example:
Will a queue named "test.example" have useCase=false and optimizedDispatch=true?
Same for the default policy entry, will that get included to configure
On Jan 11, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> there are a lot of examples on how to use destination in unit tests. For
> example, how to set default destination policy see
>
> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/policy/
Hiya, I'm trying to programmatically configure the destination policies via
PolicyMap and I'm not exactly sure how this component is expected to behave.
Looks like a lot of this behavior is magical (eh evil?) xbean stuff.
To get around this and provide a better API I created this:
public clas
On Jan 5, 2012, at 2:58 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
>> Why then do the NIO[SSL]* bits even have methods with *SocketFactory bits,
>> is this due to extending the TCP bits?
>
> It's used on the client side to create socket.
I thought the client-side was expected to use the regular ssl transport?
>
On Jan 4, 2012, at 4:36 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> There's no explicit setup for that as those are just regular queues from
> which no one consumes. The simple manual solution is to just delete unused
> queues and virtual topic will stop sending messages there
>
> Some things you can do to automat
On Jan 4, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> nio+ssl should work exactly the same as the plain ssl transport, so this
> SslBrokerService enhancement you're working is totally valid and we should
> have it.
Okay I think I can make a simple test to show working ssl and non-working
nio+ssl the
nac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
> -
> The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Has
On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:25 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> The messages will be copied to relevant queues only if there's a consumer
> there. Is there any specific problem you're experiencing.
This doesn't really line up with my understanding for how virtual topics work
at all. If my client is offline t
Does the durable subscriber expiration also affect virtual topic subscribers?
http://activemq.apache.org/manage-durable-subscribers.html
Or is there another way to control the expiration of subscribers for virtual
topics?
--jason
return result;
}
}
--jason
On Dec 8, 2011, at 7:09 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> I tried this and found out that calling addConnector() post-start won't do
> anything. But I can make a tiny sub-class that will:
>
>public class BrokerService2
>
ing a connector post-start like this?
--jason
On Dec 8, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Is it possible to add a new transport connector to a broker post starting the
> BrokerService?
>
> I'd like to start up a broker w/o any transports for vm:// use only, but may
Is it possible to add a new transport connector to a broker post starting the
BrokerService?
I'd like to start up a broker w/o any transports for vm:// use only, but may
need to configure a transport (tcp or ssl) after the application is already up
and using the broker, so it would be a pita to
rs. See this FAQ entry for more
> detail:
> http://activemq.apache.org/i-do-not-receive-messages-in-my-second-consumer.html
> "
>
> Hope this clarifies things.
>
> Torsten Mielke
> tors...@fusesource.com
> tmie...@blogspot.com
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2011, at
t; Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
> -
> The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Jason Dil
How accurate is this document wrt ActiveMQ 5.5.1? Is there a better place to
find relevant details about thread usage/meaning/configuration?
http://fusesource.com/wiki/display/ProdInfo/Understanding+the+Threads+Allocated+in+ActiveMQ
I see threads with names like:
ActiveMQ Transport tcp:...
Act
www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering what sort of overhead there is to create and then close) the
>> components needed to send a message, specifically after you have a started
>> connection and using a
I'm wondering what sort of overhead there is to create and then close) the
components needed to send a message, specifically after you have a started
connection and using a vm:// transport.
I'm working on implementing distributed eventing for a server which already has
its own eventing built-in
On Nov 10, 2011, at 7:30 AM, Eugene wrote:
> I am trying to work into that actually. I can't find the sources for the
> org.apache.activemq.selector package - it's empty in the 5.5.1 version on
> the SVN.
>
> Can you tell me where they are?
IIRC they are generated from activemq-core/src/main/gram
t; -
> The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> I was looking
BTW... can anyone explain what the units of these value are? Is "System
Average Throughput" per-???
--jason
On Nov 8, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> FYI, some performance numbers I collected if any one is interested.
>
> * * *
>
> Used default
FYI, some performance numbers I collected if any one is interested.
* * *
Used default configuration of
http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-performance-module-users-manual.html
(slightly massaged pom to get it to build, yay maven)
Run on quad-core i7 2.93 mac 10.7.2
Apache Maven 3.0.3 (r1075
I was looking at
http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-performance-module-users-manual.html to see
how well (or poorly) the http transport was over the tcp transport and I've run
into some issues just following the instructions.
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/sandbox/activemq-per
gt;>
>> Could use a description of it's behaviour which that page does not provide.
>>
>> James
>>
>> On 8 November 2011 01:45, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>
>>> ... is this any good? I keep getting folks in the backseat making
>>> tunneling
... is this any good? I keep getting folks in the backseat making tunneling
over HTTP a meta-requirement. Are there any significant issues with using the
http[s] transport in the activemq-optional module for this? Will use of it
totally kill performance?
Documentation is a bit weak here, I'v
... for its connection back to the originating broker when using multicast
discovery?
I keep running into problems when the discovered broker attempts to connect
back to the originating broker using a domain-name that the discovered broker
can not resolve properly. In some cases I can set -Dja
Set JAVA_HOME to the Sun JDK
--jason
-Original Message-
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:32:19
To:users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Error with ant -v producer
I get rid of the /usr/bin/gij now it using Sun Java compiler but a new errors
is a
Yup that is GNU java... And from what I can tell it doesn't work very well with
most apps. Yet unfortunatly many linux distros come with that on the path which
hoses many users.
Use suns JVM and life will be much easier ;-)
--jason
-Original Message-
From: "Bruce Snyder" <[EMAIL PROT
On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:46 AM, James Strachan wrote:
On 3/26/07, rmoore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we are running geronimo 1.1.1 with AMQ 3.2.4 and have come across
the issue
that was reported and fixed in INF-275
(http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-275). the bug shows
that this
Um... wtf does this have [Spam: 5.0] in the subject?
--jason
On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:06 PM, M. David Minnigerode wrote:
Still trying here... did a clean svn co of trunk. Then mvn
install. Still
fails looking for the jetty 6.1-SNAPSHOT.
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incub
If you just use the concurrent bits from 1.5, then you can use
retrotranslator to take those 1.5 classes and run them on 1.4 with
retrotranslator-runtime-n.n.n.jar and backport-util-concurrent-
n.n.jar into the classpath of the application.
So you could drop having the normal codebase using
40 matches
Mail list logo
