Re: Artemis MQ with JDBC persistence not starting since 2.22 update

but it contains test that I think is still relevant. Regards Iliya Grushevskiy > 29 июня 2022 г., в 18:34, Clebert Suconic > написал(а): > > I have sent a PR for the mirror issues: > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4127 > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 1

Re: Cross data center HA cluster

between 2 and 4 will be lost. Regards Iliya Grushevskiy > 27 мая 2022 г., в 02:36, Justin Bertram написал(а): > >> If you expect any connection loss between HA pair while having client > able to connect to both, you may encounter message loss, and replication is > not a right

Re: [EXTERNAL]:Re: Cross data center HA cluster

message loss on send. Regards Iliya Grushevskiy > 26 мая 2022 г., в 14:07, Steigerwald, Aaron > написал(а): > > Hello Iliya, > > Thank you very much for you response, it's very helpful. > > Regarding "message loss on send on network failure between data cente

Re: Cross data center HA cluster

fix this issue. - message duplicate on mirrored server This is addressed in pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4066 Regards Iliya Grushevskiy > 26 мая 2022 г., в 07:46, Justin Bertram написал(а): > > I'm not aware of such a production deployment

Message loose with HA replication

missing something? Regards Iliya Grushevskiy

RE: Huge performance difference in JVM 1.8 vs JVM 11

Ah, it’s OK. It’s just Mac JDK 11 problem. On 2022/05/18 11:44:39 Iliya Grushevskiy wrote: > Hi! > > I have noticed huge performance difference in version 2.19.1 running on JVM > 1.8 and JVM 11. > I am currently running my tests on M1 Mac mini. > > I was trying to impleme

Huge performance difference in JVM 1.8 vs JVM 11

millisecond, your journal-buffer-timeout will be 2 That’s looks suspicious. Moreover I am constantly loosing messages when running on JVM 1.8 and never on JVM 11 (may be that’s just because of speed or poor client implementation) Regards Iliya Grushevskiy