problem anymore.
For validity purpose I will leave it on again for today. (its been running
more than 18 hours now).
Again, I appreciate the effort given. Thanks.
Regards
Hatta
rajdavies wrote:
>
> Could you try the latest SNAPSHOT - I'm hoping this could be fixed
message is the same as the previous posting.
I sincerely appreciate that the ActiveMQ team would look into this matter.
Regards
Hatta
Hatta wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> Below is the response from Oracle Meta-link regarding the issue with
> maximum open cursors exceeded:
>
> WORK
: socket closed
Regards
Hatta
Jackey Ding wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have an application which having an web service using SOAP/JMS connect
> to
> activeMQ. When no client call that WS too long, the error will happen. It
> seems like the JMS Channel open too long with no me
rsors for overhead
---
sum of cursors in use.
Appreciate a response from the ActiveMQ Team.
Regards
Hatta
Hatta wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> There are a few items which I would like to add on this topic as well,
>
> 1. I have referred
sue occured again, then what
is the final solution?
Appreciate the ActiveMQ technical team to respond to this matter.
Thanks in advance
Hatta
Hatta wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I m using ActiveMQ 5.1 SNAPSHOT version. I have already experienced the
> same problem in ActiveMQ 5.0.0
(Thread.java:595)
However, My application is still able to send and receive jms messages from
the broker. But this error message is disturbing
and may give an impression that there something wrong with the server
communication with the DB.
Appreciate a response to this matter.
Regards
Hatta
Hi there,
May I know the reference to the wiki which James has updated. I would also
like to know how to turn off the auto discovery of the server
Abdullah Jibaly-3 wrote:
>
> Just a note that this turned out to be the Spark client itself. James
> added a note on the wiki showing how to turn
Noted Dhurba! (High Five dude!!!)
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I ll be highlighting more issues as I 'll be strangling activemq until the
end of this month for production readiness. :-D
Regards
Hatta
Dhruba Bandopadhyay-2 wrote:
>
> Yeah I faced this problem as well.
>
>
errors and I m able to see the results that you mentioned earlier.
Please rectify this library issues as activemq has been selected for
production use from my side.
Again, thanks for the help.
Hatta
rajdavies wrote:
>
> I think this problem will go away if you use the latest 5.1 sn
Hi Dil,
Yes, I have received the same thing. I have browse thru all the related
issue in AMQ 5.0.0 but non avail.
Appreciate a response from the team about this matter.
This log can be really disturbing when the solution goes to production.
Regards
Hatta
Dil wrote:
>
> Did somebo
Hatta wrote:
>
>
> Hi QWERTY
>
>
> Hi again guys!
>
> Just to let you know - the problem regarding the 36 process are now
> resolved.
>
> My sys admin upgraded the kernel version from 2.4 to 2.6
>
> After doing that, the process are gone and active
Hi QWERTY
Linux version 2.4.18-14 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7))
Thanks
Hatta
QWERTY? wrote:
>
> Hi Hatta,
>
> Would you be able to give some more detail on your OS kernel/distro etc
> please.
>
> we haven't been ab
configuration adjustments at ActiveMQ level.
I m using Active MQ 5.0.0
Appreciate an update.
Thanks in advance.
Hatta
QWERTY? wrote:
>
> OK ummm well the Redhat version we are using is consistent across all
> systems
>
> and it is
>
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES relea
13 matches
Mail list logo
