Hello Sampathi,
Unfortunately activemq 5.12 is no longer supported by the community.
Therefore, it's unlikely that a volunteer will find the time to
investigate your issue. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to 5.15.
Happy Holidays,
Hadrian
On 12/27/2017 11:34 PM, sampath516 wrote:
Hi All
Keep in mind that CRLs are not used much because of a few reasons. One
of the main ones is the heavy burden on ops/maintenance. You may want to
take a look at ocsp.
My $0.02,
Hadrian
On 12/11/2017 02:34 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
Can you describe how you created the activemq-revoke.crl that's
Erwin,
The NOB topology is very used, from my experience the most used in the
past years especially for redundancy and high availability. I regularly
deploy network of brokers with tens of brokers. It could go even higher,
but there's rarely enough traffic to justify that.
The topology is al
On 12/08/2017 10:39 AM, Justin Bertram wrote:
You can imagine that such organizations who make tons of investment in
ActiveMQ are not impressed by claims of 'better architecture' or my
'journaling system is faster'.
Do you have a list of what these companies are, in fact, impressed with? I
t
8 AM, Justin Bertram wrote:
I'm not clear on what you're saying. Are you indicating that Amazon and
Red Hat are partnering on this venture for ActiveMQ 5.x in AWS?
Justin
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
I made some inquiries and have it on good authority tha
I made some inquiries and have it on good authority that the AWS Managed
ActiveMQ effort was started part of the RH partnership [1]. So while the
community was not contacted, AWS did talk to people with ActiveMQ
expertise. Now I am surprised that the RH people on this list didn't
know about it
We use ActiveMQ 5, not Artemis, with Docker with large numbers of
brokers. Not swarm but Rancher and Cattle, and we are in process of
moving, again not to swarm but to Kubernetes.
It's running in Karaf (not Tomcat) using blueprints (not spring) and we
have karaf ConfigAdmin bundles that make t
Jeff,
I would start with figuring out the reason for "PKIX path validation
failed/signature check failed". It looks like the keystore is not
properly configured when attempting to reconnect. I'll try to spend some
time on this tomorrow.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 06/16/2015 03:18 PM, jeffrey wrote
, that the client takes responsibility
of the message from the broker. The only time I've done that in an
application was rare cases where losing a message was an acceptable trade
off to increase performance.
Chris
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea
wrote:
In JMS 2.0
In JMS 2.0 one has shared subscriptions for topics. There was more
interest recently around JMS 2.0. I think all the primitives are in
place in AMQ, it's just a matter of implementing it. What is a bit of a
cause for stress (for me) is the time it takes to run the unit tests.
@Christopher, in
Are you thinking about something like the producer flow control [1]?
Hadrian
[1] http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html
On 04/09/2015 07:01 AM, xabhi wrote:
Hi,
I was thinking about ways in which I cause DOS attack on activemq and how to
prevent it.
I can bring the setup down
Hi Megala,
Claus gave you one solution. The explanation is that the "dyn" apis are
actually pointing to the many ASF mirrors, that only keep the last
versions of the actively maintained branches. After that they disappear
from the mirrors, but they are kept in perpetuity in the ASF archives
[
This is very true for more reasons than those you describe. I am
presenting on activemq at apachecon in a couple of weeks and I will
probably talk about this a bit.
JMX can only give you a very limited number of useful metrics. JMX is
also almost useless in a more complex topology.
I would s
Also what kind of keys and algorithms you use may be relevant, jce not
installed, could be many things. At this point there is no clear
indication that the bug is actually in activemq. More details would help.
Best,
Hadrian
On 03/31/2015 09:13 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Can you please add a
Can you please add a few details about the environment (like the OS type
and version).
Thanks,
Hadrian
On 03/31/2015 08:48 AM, Tim Bain wrote:
Based on a few minutes of Googling, the most common cause of that exception
seems to be code that doesn't read enough bytes before trying to unwrap
(d
The archiving mechanism changed a year or so ago. The release process
also changed actually.
Releases 5.9.1 and later are actually archived here [1]. There are, of
course, non-authoritative copies in maven central.
I hope this helps,
Hadrian
[1] http://archive.apache.org/dist/activemq/
On 0
Kevin,
Go for it.
Yes, out tests need a lot of love. Actually most of the tests are not
really unit tests, but more like integration tests.
Helping with the spring (as in season) cleanup would be immensely
appreciated.
Hadrian
On 02/24/2015 02:18 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
Ah. OK… I assume
I assume you're using activemq embedded in another project and you use
maven. Try taking a look at maven's dependency mechanism and exclusions [1].
I hope this helps,
Hadrian
[1]
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-optional-and-excludes-dependencies.html
On 02/10/2
c.com² website. The Website link should stay the same as it
is currently.
Let me know if you need any changes there, and again I really appreciate
the assistance.
Thanks,
Justin
On 1/26/15, 12:28 PM, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote:
Hi Justin,
Yes, this is a good forum for discussing this.
Hi Justin,
Yes, this is a good forum for discussing this. Can you please post the
text you're proposing?
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/26/2015 10:01 AM, Justin Reock wrote:
Hi ActiveMQ community,
I'm wondering who I would need to get in touch with to improve the verbiage on
ActiveMQ's Commercial
Hi Marcin,
I quickly looked at your xml. You are not using blueprint, just spring.
I saw the error you mentioned a few times. I didn't try to reproduce, I
will try tomorrow if I could manage to find the time. However, from my
vague recollection the issue is related to a bundle fragment not bei
Hard to tell without seeing your xml configuration. My first suspicion
is that you are mixing the spring and blueprint namespaces.
Probably using a blueprint xml and define a bean in the spring namespace.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/19/2015 02:39 PM, marcin wrote:
Hi,
My application runs on OSGi e
You got it. If CompUSA ran out of it, try CircuitCity.
Hadrian
On 01/18/2015 09:00 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
This always bothered me:
What’s this?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/36041/activemq-5.x-box-reflection.png?version=1&modificationDate=1397503385000&api=v2
Is i
Yes, it can. I implemented something similar. When connections are
restored the messages get processed.
That's the short answer.
Hadrian
On 05/11/2014 07:23 AM, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
Hello,
I need to build a system with a number of hosts connected through an
unreliable mesh network where the
Slight correction:
*All* software and docs from ASF *are* actually provided free of charge to the
public in source format (and sometimes binary) under the Apache License
version 2.0 [1].
Other 3rd parties including commercial organizations may provide additional
derivative work, including but
Try tweaking the log configuration in log4j.properties to filter out unwanted
logs.
Hadrian
On Tuesday 08 April 2014 11:21:30 barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> Is there a way to suppress certain messages that we don't want to see in
> our activemq logs?
>
ActiveMQ does not yet build with java 8.
Hadrian
On Monday 07 April 2014 01:51:59 khandelwalanuj wrote:
> Anybody get a chance to look at this ?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-with-JAVA-8-tp4679842p46801
> 02.html Sent from th
:
> Hadrian Zbarcea wrote
>
> > Not sure what you mean. The Building section instructs one to run:
> >
> > ./autogen.sh
> > ./configure
> > make
> > make install
> >
> > The note you mentioned refers to warnings you may see after running
> >
Not sure what you mean. The Building section instructs one to run:
./autogen.sh
./configure
make
make install
The note you mentioned refers to warnings you may see after running
autogen.sh.
Doesn't that work for you?
Hadrian
On Tuesday 01 April 2014 20:51:36 naris wrote:
> The web page on bui
The Apache ActiveMQ project [1] officially released the 5.4.1 maintenance
release [2] a couple of months after the previous 5.4.0 release. We are
extremely grateful to the community for all the contributions. The artifacts
are already available in the central maven repo.
The 5.4.1 release (see
You are correct: the dev list is for activemq development. You're
probably better off using the users list. No penalty though if you
get them mixed up :).
Thanks for using ActiveMQ,
Hadrian
On Jan 17, 2008, at 2:35 PM, DavidShaw wrote:
I am looking to embed an ActiveMQ JMS queue into a
31 matches
Mail list logo
