Re: Derby journaledJDBC persistence adapter never checkpoint!

2008-09-24 Thread Fuzzo
Solved! Added useDatabaseLock="false" in the journaledJDBC configuration element. The master/slave cluster works well because the lock is in the journal and not in the db! Thanks! Fuzzo wrote: > > I've tried with -Dderby.storage.fileSyncTransactionLog=false but without

Re: Derby journaledJDBC persistence adapter never checkpoint!

2008-09-24 Thread Fuzzo
pt the last one!!! See also http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=19574483&framed=y this thread for details... I hope someone can help me with this issue... Thanks! Fuzzo wrote: > > Hi all! > > I'm using ActiveMQ with journaledJDBC persistent adapter, configured

Derby journaledJDBC persistence adapter never checkpoint!

2008-09-23 Thread Fuzzo
Hi all! I'm using ActiveMQ with journaledJDBC persistent adapter, configured like this: At this location there are: derbydb journal derby.log Inside derbydb/log there are a lot of files in format: logn.dat (~1MB) where n is between 1 and, after a day, 892 for a total of 904MB of file

Re: JDBC Master/Slave with HSQLDB lock problem!

2008-09-19 Thread Fuzzo
I switched bach to JDBC persistence due to some slow-consuming messages with Kaha :( I've solved the lock problem wrapping my hsqldb data source with a journal so the lock in in the journal and not in the db (useDatabaseLock="false"). The master broker starts correctly and works fine but when i

How to controlo Kaha disk space usage!

2008-09-11 Thread Fuzzo
Hi all! I'm using amqPersistenceAdapter (that i suppose is Kaha Store + Journal) configured for Master/Slave. Unfortunatly the disk space on NAS isn't unlimited: there is a way to configure a rolling or a cleaning thread for the store files? Thanks a lot! -- View this message in context: http

Re: JDBC Master/Slave with HSQLDB lock problem!

2008-09-10 Thread Fuzzo
d by default. > > 2008/9/5 Fuzzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Hi all! >> >> When i try to start ActiveMQ with an HSQLDB data source i give this >> error: >> >> INFO | jvm 1| 2008/09/05 16:55:46 | INFO BrokerService >> - Using P

JDBC Master/Slave with HSQLDB lock problem!

2008-09-05 Thread Fuzzo
Hi all! When i try to start ActiveMQ with an HSQLDB data source i give this error: INFO | jvm 1| 2008/09/05 16:55:46 | INFO BrokerService - Using Persistence Adapter: JDBCPersistenceAdaptor([EMAIL PROTECTED]) INFO | jvm 1| 2008/09/05 16:55:46 | INFO JDBCPersistence

Re: Journal Problem

2008-08-29 Thread Fuzzo
tps://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa > > 2008/8/29 Fuzzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> I think it is not a journal problem: it happens also with non-journaled >> JDBC >> persistence adapter with MySQL datasource. >> >> I'

Re: Journal Problem

2008-08-29 Thread Fuzzo
SNAPSHOT: same thing :( In log (DEBUG level), nothing to say... How i can resolve this? Note that with 2 topic consumer, this problem appears more quickly rather than only one consumer. Please help me! Fuzzo wrote: > > > I'm using version 5.1.0 > > > Hiram Chirin

Re: Journal Problem

2008-08-16 Thread Fuzzo
I'm using version 5.1.0 Hiram Chirino wrote: > > What version you using? > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Fuzzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi all! >> The scenario is the following: >> - one producer to topic >> - two consumer &

Journal Problem

2008-08-08 Thread Fuzzo
Hi all! The scenario is the following: - one producer to topic - two consumer Sometimes i get the following error: ERROR JournalPersistenceAdapter - Failed to mark the Journal: org.apache.activeio.journal.InvalidRecordLocationException: The location is less than the last mark. This cause o

Re: Creating a startup subscription...

2008-07-31 Thread Fuzzo
need to use topics so here' some possibilities. > > Virtual topics > http://activemq.apache.org/virtual-destinations.html > > Retroactive consumers and related recovery policy > http://activemq.apache.org/retroactive-consumer.html > http://activemq.apache.org/subscription-rec

Creating a startup subscription...

2008-07-31 Thread Fuzzo
Hi all! I need to create a startup subscription due to avoid packet loss. Scenario (time from left to right): pkt0---pkt1-pkt2 pkt 3 AMQ START - CONSUMER1 In this example, consumer1 can't handle pkt0-2 because its subscription is created only AFTER pkt2.

Re: Limited heap size and poor performances

2008-07-08 Thread Fuzzo
Self-reply: the ActiveMQ distibution seems does not specify -server parameter in the Java Service Wrapper configuration file... Now the heap is about 60MB :) I hope the problem is solved! Fuzzo wrote: > > Hi all! > In my application I need use AMQ for messaging but there is