Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Franck Malka
work for your use-case technically speaking, but that's relying on > undocumented (and unintended) behavior. > > > Justin > > [1] > > https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/wildcard-syntax.html#wildcard-syntax > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:04 AM

Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Franck Malka
ideal. > > > Justin > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 4:18 AM Franck Malka wrote: > > > Hi, All > > > > In my broker.xml I configured different address-settings for different > > address name matches. > > mainly altering max-size-bytes and paging-max-size by

max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Franck Malka
Hi, All In my broker.xml I configured different address-settings for different address name matches. mainly altering max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes parameters. I do observe significant improvement in performance with the new settings. What I don't understand is that on the JMX console i

Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-20 Thread Franck Malka
Ok, In case the problem is direct memory Do you think disable netty direct memory would have a serious impact on performance? E.g. -Dio.netty.noPreferDirect=true -Dio.netty.maxDirectMemory=0 -Dio.netty.allocator.type=unpooled On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 10:47 AM Anton Roskvist wrote: > Hi, > > I thi

Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-19 Thread Franck Malka
the problem? > > > Justin > > [1] https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-native > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 5:35 AM Franck Malka wrote: > > > Hi, all > > > > I have a case with an Artemis ActiveMq cluster which process a very large > > number of me

ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-19 Thread Franck Malka
Hi, all I have a case with an Artemis ActiveMq cluster which process a very large number of messages per second. Each few weeks of operation, JVM memory is still cleaning properly but native memory is not getting cleared. Did anyone encounter this case? Does it sounds more like a configuration i