#x27;t the
> brokers from each docker instance be sharing the same journal directory?
> Can you elaborate on specifically why "ghost directories" would be left
> behind?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 7:25 AM Felipe Fraga
> wrote:
>
> > He
Hello all,
I have some Apache Artemis running on identical docker containers and I am
trying to setup HA using modified configuration from the examples:
100
-1
2000
1
true
eally
know if it's ok to leave both brokers processes pointing to the same
journal directory on the filesystem. Is it?
Thanks once more,
Felipe
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 11:39 PM Felipe Fraga wrote:
> Thanks again for the reply.
>
> So, after your explanation, I think I understood it be
nctionality you're looking for.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 6:09 AM Felipe Fraga
> wrote:
>
> > Hello and thanks for your reply,
> >
> > I guess what I would really want is to have 2 live servers sharing the
> same
> > storage on
>
> Also, Artemis supports JGroups which has pluggable discovery mechanisms
> that work in various clouds without the use of multicast. Have you tried
> using any of those?
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:14 AM Felipe Fraga
> wrote:
>
> > Hello a
Hello all,
I have a standalone Artemis 2.6.4 running and I am connecting to it using
JMS from the client of an embedded Artemis on Wildfly 13, so Artemis client
1.5.5.
My client code looks like this:
@Inject
@JMSConnectionFactory(JMSConnectionFactoryName.DEFAULT)
private JMSContext jmsContext;
Hello all,
I now have ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.4 deployed as docker container in an
elastic cloud environment.
Nodes can be scaled up or down at any time and actual IP's cannot be known
during configuration time, so I can't create a cluster-connection using
static cluster members.
I also have an out