ical)
Hello Deepti-
What version of ActiveMQ are you using? I suspect that you have incorrect
information about CVE-2021-44228 and ActiveMQ.
-Matt Pavlovich
> On Feb 7, 2022, at 6:20 AM, Deepti Sharma S
> wrote:
>
> Hello Justin,
>
> I would like to follow-up on the release
bsite [4].
Justin
[1] https://activemq.apache.org/contributing
[2] https://github.com/apache/activemq/tree/main/activemq-all
[3] https://lists.apache.org/list.html?users@activemq.apache.org
[4] https://activemq.apache.org/contact
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:06 AM Deepti Sharma S
wrote:
> Hello Just
has *already* been answered on this thread (and many other places
on this mailing list).
Justin
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 8:27 AM Deepti Sharma S
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> 2 questions:
> Does Active MQ all (//
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.activemq/activemq-all
r
> > folks.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022, 6:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Again, a new time:
> >>
> >> https://activemq.apache.org/news/cve-2021-44228
> >>
> >>
t;> they are using log4j 1.x
>>
>> ActiveMQ 5.17.x (not yet released) will use at least log4j 2.17.1.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>> Le 8 janv. 2022 à 11:35, Deepti Sharma S
>>>
>> a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hello Team,
&g
Hello Team,
As we have Log4J vulnerability CVE-2021-44228, CVSS 10.0 (Critical), can you
please confirm, when we have ActiveMQ all, version release which has this
vulnerability fix and has Log4J version 2.17?
Regards,
Deepti Sharma
PMP(r) & ITIL
