s true for xaresources based on the same
amq-connection.
now everything works as expected, but don't know if this would be a valid
approach (or even the right place) to fix this :)
ty
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Daniel Guggi wrote:
> the jta spec says:
>
> 3.4.6 Resource
, Daniel Guggi wrote:
> glassfish code just does that:
>
> it know the following resources states (one TransactionContext per
> connection - same xid,same branch => imo ok because
> TransactionContext.isSameRM returns true)
>
>
> TransactionContext{transac
for
different activemq-connections -> TransactionContext.isSameRM()
daniel
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Daniel Guggi wrote:
> i forget to mention.
>
> when we do not throw an exception after the jms-template send everything
> works fine - transaction gets c
i forget to mention.
when we do not throw an exception after the jms-template send everything
works fine - transaction gets committed org.apache.activemq.
TransactionContext.end(xid,flags) is called twice as expected...
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Daniel Guggi wrote:
> hi,
>
&g
hi,
we use spring's DMLC using an xa-pooledconnectionfactory
when the DMLC receives a message the (test) message-lister just sends a
message to another queue using spring's jmstemplate. this jms-template also
uses a xa-pooledconnectionfactory (but another instance)
that meas that we have two act
hi,
i read through the docs to see the current status of apollo - and it seems
to support jms via (stopjms and openwire).
are there any plans on support for xa transactions?
tia,
daniel
ns about this limit and the following is
> the representative one,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-221
>
> SuoNayi
>
>
> 2013/3/27 Daniel Guggi
>
> > thank your for your info.
> >
> > would i work in theory for my case (because i ensure that all messages
hi,
version: activemq-5.8.0
we don't want client/consumer redelivery, so therefore we have set
maximumRedeliveries=0 on the connectionFactory
(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java). Simple local (single-instance-broker)
tests verfied that no redelivery was performed.
today we tried a simple failover s
> It's more easy for problem diagnosis if some trouble is present.
> Besides, Do not use sparse selector or your consumers may get stuck.
>
>
>
>
> At 2013-03-26 22:58:29,"Daniel Guggi" wrote:
> >hi,
> >
> >im curious if it is possible to use
hi,
im curious if it is possible to use message-groups and jms selectors
together.
example:
i have consumer 'normalPriorityConsumer' for queue "X" with selector
'JMSProperty >= 4'
i have consumer 'lowPrioritiyConsumer' for queue "X" with selector
'JMSProperty < 4'
all messages send to queue "X"
hi,
im using activemq-rar-5.7.0 to connect external broker to glassfish app
server.
so far communication works fine - however i want to change the redelivery
policy now
* I can do so on the resource-adapter using the fields defined in
ActiveMQConnectionSupport (e.g. InitialRedeliveryDelay etc.)
11 matches
Mail list logo