, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for sharing this with us. I have updated the little migration
> guide we have:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/5.8+Migration+Guide
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:43 PM, DV wrote:
> > Just wanted to point out som
We've had similar issue in the past, which went away with the following
changes:
* adding closeAsync=false to transportConnectors
* using nio instead of tcp in transportConnectors
* setting ulimits to unlimited for activemq user
* fine-tuning kahaDB settings (enableIndexWriteAsync="true"
enableJou
Just wanted to point out something not very obvious for those upgrading to
5.8.0 version of ActiveMQ: after the upgrade, my init startup script failed
and I've noticed run.jar is missing from bin/ directory. I looked through
release notes and there was no mention of this change. Finally I was able
Just following up... I wonder if anyone else has experienced high swap
usage and/or network timeouts in ActiveMQ and what steps they've taken
to fix that. Thanks!
- DV
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:00 PM, DV wrote:
> I forgot to mention one more thing. This sort of behavior (high swap
>
s a sample log entry:
2013-01-05 12:16:20,352 | ERROR | Could not accept connection :
java.io.IOException: Too many open files |
org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnector | ActiveMQ Transport
Server: nio://0.0.0.0:1102?transport.closeAsync=false
- DV
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:46 PM, DV wrot
Hi all,
I'd like to post some symptoms we're seeing with our ActiveMQ
publishing broker and maybe get some ideas on what we need to tweak.
We're using ActiveMQ to push publishing messages to a set of pre-prod
and prod consumers. During peak of publishing, ActiveMQ becomes
unresponsive (web UI tim
Though I really like the idea of mKahaDB, it's unusable to us right
now because of the bug described in AMQ-3841 - we frequently encounter
it with AMQ 5.6 and the fix isn't due until 5.7 is out :/
- DV
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> On
performance, kind
of like MongoDB does.
- DV
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Oleg Dulin wrote:
> Dear Distinguished Colleagues:
>
> I've been trying to understand something.
>
> My queues take Java object messages. Serialized into bytes, each Java object
> is about 1.5K
We've recently started testing ActiveMQ 5.6.0 with mKahaDB adapter,
configured as suggested on the site:
We're using
