Re: MQTT and JMS/NMS: ActiveMQ vs. Apollo

2013-01-17 Thread Christian Webel
are durable subscribers so unless they ack, all > > messages will be retained by the broker. > > I am using CleanSession = false to allow for offline queuing. > Unless there is another way I really need this feature. > > > On 5 December 2012 00:27, Christian Webel wrote: &

Re: MQTT and JMS/NMS: ActiveMQ vs. Apollo

2012-12-04 Thread Christian Webel
Dec 2012 16:20:07 +0100 > Von: "Christian Webel" > An: users@activemq.apache.org > Betreff: Re: MQTT and JMS/NMS: ActiveMQ vs. Apollo > Thanks. That will be my first plugin, so let's try it :-) > > Original-Nachricht > > Datum: Mon, 3 D

Re: MQTT and JMS/NMS: ActiveMQ vs. Apollo

2012-12-03 Thread Christian Webel
oke jmssemantic of > failover, see; https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3792 > > The MQTT use case makes a strong argument for being able to disable this ( > clientID) check and not having to depend on the underlying tcp behaviour > to > promptly clean up closed or half

Re: MQTT and JMS/NMS: ActiveMQ vs. Apollo

2012-12-03 Thread Christian Webel
nection isn't being cleaned up > properly when it goes away. Is this something you can reproduce? > > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Christian Webel wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm currently trying to add mobile clients (Android, eclipse paho client >

MQTT and JMS/NMS: ActiveMQ vs. Apollo

2012-12-03 Thread Christian Webel
Hi, I'm currently trying to add mobile clients (Android, eclipse paho client API) via the MQTT protocol to our ActiveMQ and Apollo server. The other clients use JMS/NMS. Transport connectors are correctly defined. I have experienced following problems: Using ActiveMQ 5.7: Everthing seems to