I noticed 1.6.0 was released. What is the timeline for getting that posted
on Nuget?
Chris Robison
d static include
>
>
> This is needed because the destination advisories are no longer propagated.
>
> On 16 May 2012 18:13, Chris Robison wrote:
> > So I tried that and the client appears to be sending just fine, but the
> > producer on the other side of the network co
of config, to disable the connection from
> tracking temp destination advisories so that it allows the request to
> go to the broker.
>
> factory.setWatchTopicAdvisories(false);
> or ?jms.watchTopicAdvisories=false on the connection factory broker url
>
> On 15 May 2012 23:30, Chr
repos/asf/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/RequestReplyNoAdvisoryNetworkTest.java
>
>
> On 11 May 2012 17:45, Chris Robison wrote:
> > Another interesting observation: as a test, I connected all producers and
> > consumers to MSTMIP102 (th
ion in any sensible way)
>
> There is a test that exercises these options
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/RequestReplyNoAdvisoryNetworkTest.java
>
>
> On 11 May 2012 17:45, Chris Robison wrote:
> &g
n
all producers and consumers, but after 1 or 2 request-replies, MSIPAP101 is
flooded with the temp queue advisories--even though there are no producers
or consumers connected to it.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Chris Robison wrote:
> Here is the log from the latest run with the TTL down to 1.
Here is the log from the latest run with the TTL down to 1. It still floods
after about 1 or 2 request-reply calls. It just seems to be alternating
between add temp queue and remove temp queue messages.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Chris Robison wrote:
> Yes, because we have a spoke and
, if there is only one
> broker, the default value of 1 will be fine.
>
> On 11 May 2012 16:32, Chris Robison wrote:
> > If it helps, I've attached the configuration files for both machines.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Chris Robison
> >
If it helps, I've attached the configuration files for both machines.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Chris Robison wrote:
> One thing I have noticed though is that when I restart the broker on the
> other end, everything starts to work again until it floods again.
>
>
> On
One thing I have noticed though is that when I restart the broker on the
other end, everything starts to work again until it floods again.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Chris Robison wrote:
> I'm on 5.6. And all brokers remain up and running.
>
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:
I'm on 5.6. And all brokers remain up and running.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
> what version are you on?
> Is there any chance that the broker at the other end of the network
> bridge is shutting down?
>
> On 11 May 2012 14:34, Chris Robison wrote:
Even with no consumer attached to MSSD5D101, it still gets flooded.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> I have a very simple network of brokers. Their names are as follows (to
> help understand the log):
>
> MSTMIP101
> MSSD5D101
>
> They each reside in d
And in response to you comment about including the HTTP core jar in the
project, apparently it does not included the abstract class that was
missing. I had to go download the Apache HTTP components in full to get
that.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> I'm p
eck your process and see if the jar
> > is there in the java process path
> >
> > ps -ef | grep -i java
> >
> > The issue has to do with the missing jar and the classpath (if the
> > exception you sent is correct)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Jaskirat
> &
/class/org/apache/http/message/AbstractHttpMessage.html
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On May 4, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Chris Robison
> wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to get a java client connecting an AMQ server over HTTP, but
> the
> > client keeps throwing the
I checked out all of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/activemq-dotnet<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/activemq-dotnet/vendor>.
Do I need to checkout each trunk separately?
Chris
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 12:49 -04
r 9, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> I tried the release candidate. Still exhibits the same behavior.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
>
>> Just in case this helps you further, I implemented a tracer. Attached is
>> the log output from tha
I tried the release candidate. Still exhibits the same behavior.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> Just in case this helps you further, I implemented a tracer. Attached is
> the log output from that.
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:21 PM
Just in case this helps you further, I implemented a tracer. Attached is
the log output from that.
Chris
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 16:10 -0400, Chris Robison wrote:
> > More on the issue. I'm noticing that if I don't
ll exception. I
also started noticing that after an attempt to send to a non-existent temp
queue, that the producer send() method started to hang indefinitely. The
usage limits are set very high so I don't it was that because I also have
the sendFailIfNoSpace set to true.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 a
I have a windows service that is long running, listening to messages from a
particular queue. This windows service replies to messages off the queue.
Right now, if there are old messages on the queue, there is a good change
the temp queue set in the message no longer exists and it appears as though
Sorry, that was really badly written. Is the .NET client library supposed
to be able to reconnect itself with the ActiveMQ broker or is that
something I have to catch and do myself?
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> Is the .NET client library reconnect itself so is t
Is the .NET client library reconnect itself so is that something I have to
catch and do?
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> I'm assuming you mean set it on the connection factory. I've tried that,
> but no go. The only way I've found to recover from
-07 at 11:56 -0600, Chris Robison wrote:
> > I'm running into an interesting issue. I have a client connecting to an
> > activemq server, trying to consume messages and reply to a temporary
> > destination set. The ActiveMQ server debug is showing the following:
> >
I have a network of brokers where some brokers will be part of a core
service and some will reside on edge installs. The core service brokers
will be able to freely pass messages around. However, the brokers at
the edges will be connecting via a network connector using a user that
won't be very pri
Looks like it works now.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> I've just committed a fix for that. Could you update and try again?
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Chris Robison >wrote:
>
> > I just got the latest source from the AMQ repo and a re
I just got the latest source from the AMQ repo and a recent change to a
maven dependency is causing a build problem. The fusemq-leveldb-version got
changed from 1.0 to 99-master-SHAPSHOT and maven can't seem to find that
dependency. Is there a new maven repo that contains this dependency?
Thanks,
Never mind. Found this document:
http://activemq.apache.org/certificateunknown.html. Everything works now.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> The other broker is reporting the following: Received fatal alert:
> certificate_unknown.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at
The other broker is reporting the following: Received fatal alert:
certificate_unknown.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> I'm trying create a network of brokers between just two brokers using ssl.
> It is having problems telling me "No X509TrustManage
I'm trying create a network of brokers between just two brokers using ssl.
It is having problems telling me "No X509TrustManager implementation
available." Any suggestions?
Chris
Thank you! That worked swimmingly!
chris
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 14:53 -0700, Chris Robison wrote:
> > Looking at the code, it looks like I have to be able to set the
> > AcceptInvalidBrokerCert on the SslTransportFactory, b
Chris
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Chris Robison wrote:
> I'm using the latest .NET activemq NMS library to connect to the broker.
> I'm having some problems, I keep getting an exception that says: The remote
> certificate is invalid according to the validation procedure.
Submitted the patch to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3701
Chris
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Chris Robison wrote:
> I'd be happy to do that. What package do you want me to put the class in?
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
o trunk, attach a patch to a new jira and
> tick the license grant check box on file upload.
> http://activemq.apache.org/contributing.html
>
> On 3 February 2012 21:13, Chris Robison wrote:
> > I looked at that tutorial already. And you're right, works fine with
> Apa
fine against Apache Directory Server.
> http://fusesource.com/docs/broker/5.5/security/LDAP.html
>
> Perhaps this tutorial can help?
>
>
> Torsten Mielke
> tors...@fusesource.com
> tmie...@blogspot.com
>
> On Feb 2, 2012, at 10:13 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
>
> &g
ot;CN=MQUser,OU=Groups,OU=ActiveMQ,DC=cdr,DC=corp". The LDAPAuthorizationMap
considers the name of the
role "MQUser,OU=Groups,OU=ActiveMQ,DC=cdr,DC=corp". Is this by design? I
would be happy to submit a patch to change this behavior. Thoughts?
Chris Robison
I'm trying to build apache-activemq-5.5.1-fuse-01-13 and I keep getting the
following error:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project activemq-camel: Could not resolve
dependencies for project
org.apache.activemq:activemq-camel:bundle:5.5.1-fuse-01-13: The following
artifacts could not be resolve
Nevermind, I found my answer in the FAQs.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> In my journey to integrate with an LDAP system, I've noticed there are a
> few extra features on the current Fuse broker release when compared to the
> current Apache release. I was
Sweet! Now I'm getting an LDAP error, which is progress.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> Ah, start w/ line 0.. that puts it at connectionPassword. Try adding " "
> around "Password!". The exclamation point may be throwing it off.
>
&g
The error says line 6 which in my login.config is connectionUsername.
Chris
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
> When I run it, I still get the error.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
>> Chris-
>>
>> I whipped up a
>authentication=simple
>userBase="OU=Users,OU=**ActiveMQ,DC=cdr,DC=corp"
>userSearchMatching="(**samaccountname={0})"
>userSearchSubtree=false
>roleBase="OU=Groups,OU=**ActiveMQ,DC=cdr,DC=corp"
>roleName=cn
> roleS
file.
>
> See:
>
> com.sun.security.auth.login.**ConfigFile
>
>
>
> On 2/1/12 1:59 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
>
>> Yeah, it's the exact same exception.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Matt Pavlovich
>> wrote:
>>
>> Are you getting the exa
Yeah, it's the exact same exception.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> Are you getting the exact same exception? Your original exception cause
> shows a null value for a key in that config:
>
>
> Caused by: java.io.IOException: Configuration Error:
> Line 6: expected [opt
t. I think the problem is that you have it empty, so
> its parsing as NULL, and you are getting the error. Try not setting it,
> and see if the default works for you.
>
>
> On 2/1/12 12:22 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to use the LDAP login module to tie
I'm trying to use the LDAP login module to tie into Active Directory.
Here's what my AMQ conf looks like:
Here is what the login.config looks like:
ldap-login {
org.apache.activemq.jaas.LDAPLoginModule required
debug=true
initialContextFactory=com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFact
>
> Content-based router:
> http://camel.apache.org/**content-based-router.html<http://camel.apache.org/content-based-router.html>
>
> Hope this helps,
> Matt Pavlovich
>
>
> On 1/27/12 2:54 PM, Chris Robison wrote:
>
>> Let me describe my scenario and hopefully
46 matches
Mail list logo
