But now I tried it and in the meantime, when both (non-exclusive) diverts are
active, it duplicates the messages. So unfortunately, that's not a valid
option.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
That's brilliant! Thank you. :-)
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hello.
I'm working on an automatized broker configuration in a way that it's
supposed to fully reflect the workflow. What I struggle with though is
reconfiguration of a divert. The source code of 2.12.0 states this:
This basically means that a divert will be deployed only if there's no
binding
Thank you for these links, Brusdev. Very interesting. I shall read it and
hopefully figure out what to do next too. :-)
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
@jbertram Yes, just the headers. :-)
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hello Brusdev,
the purpose is to send an event about something that happened. More
specifically, our cloud service has several connectors that our customers
use to send their files to us for further processing. The files that we
receive are sent to an address with a couple of queues. And I'd like
Hello.
I'd like to receive only metadata of each message and not the message
payload itself in order to save quite a lot of resources as I don't care
about the payload. Is it possible? From what I found the payload is
downloaded automatically even though I don't read it from the buffer.
Thank you
Thank you for the tip.
But I'd prefer an offline method because the problem I'm trying to solve
comes with the cluster turned off.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hello.
For the sake of safe cluster restarts I've created a solution based on
comparing when the slave and the broker went live. This way I can make them
start in the correct order so that no data is lost. Unfortunately, the only
way how to get the timestamp is to browse the broker logs which turn
So does that mean that -- after shutting down master and then slave -- it's
not enough to start the slave again and that the master server must be then
started as well? Because, obviously, starting the master first isn't an
option as it might have older data than its slave, right?
--
Sent from:
Ah, my bad then. I’m sorry, I must have been out of my mind when writing the
post.
The reason why I still have to deal with this is that I’ve experienced
deadlocks when committing during failover. Nothing but rebooting the client
helped. I might open a different topic in case it happens again.
Ja
Isn't the test missing the "consumer.commit(...)" part? If not, why?
It seems that without it the committing does not happen. One would say that
it's obvious, right? :-) Yet the test works without it. Is it because the
consumer is closed right after consuming the message?
--
Sent from: http://
I too have experienced this issue with a large amount of "large messages".
I'm talking several GiBs of data. Suddenly, the amount of opened FDs went so
high the broker stopped working.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Got it! :-)
This is the bit that I was missing: I didn't know that I need to actually
acknowledge the message before I refuse it!
**
Thank you for pointing me the right direction. :-)
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Thank you for your responses, Justin. Also thank you for noting the journal
backup feature. That's great news. :)
Meanwhile, I've developed a simple scripted solution that works for
statically configured clusters such as mine. It simply extracts the broker
configuration and state (the last time it
Hello.
How do I make my message end up in DLQ while using the Core protocol?
My code in Groovy:
The assertion should be true, as the message is supposed to end up in the
default DLQ after 10 receive attempts as per [1]. But even on a freshly
spawned Artemis 2.8.1 instance this does not work.
I
This isn't a valid setup. Only one slave per master can work as expected.
You're about to lose data if you continue this way. I was there recently.
Look this topic up on the forums to get more information about the reasons.
This setup is surprisingly common.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324
/One issue to be aware of is: in case of a successful fail-over, the backup's
data will be newer than the one at the live's storage. If you configure your
live server to perform a failback to live server when restarted, it will
synchronize its data with the backup's. If both servers are shutdown, t
Have you resolved the issue somehow?
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Greetings.
I'm implementing an EDI solution based on Artemis: EDI payloads travel
between various endpoints until all message transformations are done.
Because the data in the system is very valuable, I need to be sure that
nothing is lost in case of server crash. Also our systems are all set up v
Hi !
Does activemq resource adapter keep the connection pool valid ?
Isn't there any way that I can remove bad connection and re-establish new
ones ?
I have used with following activemq setup and it didn't work. The bad
connection stays in the
pool forever
Thanks.
--
Hi !
I have found out the InactivityMonitor (checks out connection health
periodically)
It was exactly what I needed especially when my network environment is
unstable.
But how do you re-establish the closed connection after inactivitymonitor
closes out the socket ?
I want my consumer to be work
No problem. Thanks for all the work you guys have done.
It's working for me too.
Thanks.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> Sorry about that - it looks like Rob forgot to checkin a file: )
>
> I've patched the build, its working fine for me now.
>
>
> On 7/10/07, B
I have checked out the latest version and compiled.
Error is following :
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
D:\99.Tmp\amq.
I'd like to try the shared file system masterslave in window.
I have two brokers (brokerA, brokerB). They were setup in one machine with
different port numbers.
In Broker A:
[...]
In Broker B:
So I ran the first broker ok then, I ran the second one, it gave me the
following err
25 matches
Mail list logo