You haven't show all the applicable code. You've selected a "client
acknowledge" session, but you don't show the code where you are
actually receiving the message. Are you acknowledging the message
once you've received it?
Also, why are you committing the session here? If you want to use
transa
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:30 PM, kevinlane wrote:
>
> I need to connect to a SSL secured ActiveMQ broker with .NET. Has SSL
> support been added to NMS yet?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
I recently switched from using the NMS drivers to using the Java
ActiveMQ drivers via IKVM and this has solved nearly
Hey guys,
I'm back on our ActiveMQ connection problems (again!). I'm deep
diving into the code, and trying to understand what is going on. Our
message queues get stuck, sometimes it takes a couple days, but
inevitably it happens forcing a restart of the server and all services
that connect to th
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jim Gomes wrote:
> That sounds like a bug. My understanding of how sessions work is if you
> have set the AcknowledgementMode.Transactional, none of the messages that
> you send to producers created on that session will be visible to any
> consumers until the Comm
u provide some sample
> code showing the problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Bryan Murphy wrote:
>
>> Essentially two phase commit. We keep running into the problem where
>> our message are handled before the producer can commit it's
>&
articipating inside a transaction. Are you
> talking about implementing a two-phase commit extended transaction
> operation? Or are you talking about using the transaction acknowledgment
> mode that is part of NMS?
>
> - Jim
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Bryan Murphy w
Is there a way I can have the sending of messages to a message queue
participate inside a transaction while using C# and NMS?
Thanks,
Bryan
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:18 AM, user939393
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have and it works great.
>
> This command will create the dll that you need.
> ikvmc.exe -target:library -out:activemq-client.dll "C:\Program
> Files\Apache\apache-activemq-5.1.0\activemq-all-5.1.0.jar"
>
> Your project w
Hey guys,
I'm still having trouble with the reliability of connections to our message
bus server when using NMS. Our ActiveMQ server dies with with OutOfMemory
exceptions about once per week. At least until 5.2 comes out, I'd like to
automate a nightly restart of the ActiveMQ server, and this lea
Is there a way I can have the administration interface automatically sort
the queues by name when I go to the queues page without having to click on
the name column?
Thanks,
Bryan
Why can't you just provide both? I've never really seen why this is such a
big issue. If you provide both strong named and non-strong named
assemblies, then you make both crowds happy.
Bryan
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Mark Pollack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In order to put as
time? I wonder what
> could have caused that error. I take it that this is not the same error
> that you were getting previously?
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Bryan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > It didn't survive the night. It dumped this sta
> Yeah, it won't handle network outages. That's where failover comes in
> (scheduled for 1.1). However, this should keep any firewalls or routers
> from aggressively disconnecting the sockets.
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Bryan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wr
right direction!! :)
Bryan
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Bryan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool! I've updated updated my local NMS library and am currently running a
> test. I'll let you know in a few hours how it turns out.
> Thanks,
> Bryan
>
> On
Cool! I've updated updated my local NMS library and am currently running a
test. I'll let you know in a few hours how it turns out.
Thanks,
Bryan
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Jim Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI, the NMS trunk now has the keep alive support implemented. You can
> tu
erience and I have
> > been able to keep connections alive for a very long time without errors,
> > both with high- and low-activity, even going over what my infrastructure
> > team has told me is a WAN connection.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jim
> >
> > On Tue
Thanks for the info. I suspected that's what the timeout meant, but you
never really know until you ask..
Anyway, we finally solved our issue. We setup two instances of ActiveMQ in
the two data centers to forward messages back and forth between each other.
This is working much better for us. It
Sounds like a nightmare to me. Maybe I don't understand what you're trying
to accomplish, but I think something like Hadoop would be a better fit for
this kind of problem.
Bryan
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Martin_Cornelius <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> i am currently evaluati
Hey Guys,
We're still having problems consuming messages from an ActiveMQ service via
Apache.NMS. We've fixed a few bugs in the past week, and we're left with
one outstanding issue where we have one of our consumers in a different
data-center than the message server. It appears as if our TCP conn
he client side. See my
> article on how to do it:
>
> http://vchekan.blogspot.com/2008/08/tracing-in-nms-it-easy-to-turn-protocol.html
>
> Vadim.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Bryan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > More information...
> > T
decided to stop sending messages to my
consumer.
Bryan
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Bryan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I changed my consumers to use client-acknowledge and immediately
> acknowledge the message upon receipt. My handler does the following:
>
> void Han
usly wrong. I'm at a loss
what to do next.
Thanks,
Bryan
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Bryan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read more about calling acknowledge, and as far as I can tell, because I
> was using transactional acknowledgement as well as session commit
order. Once again, I'll
post back here with the results of these changes.
If you notice any flaw in my reasoning, please do tell me. :)
Thanks,
Bryan
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Bryan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> We're currently using transa
Hi Jim,
We're currently using transactional messages. What we do is the following:
- create connection factory
- create session (acknowledgement mode = transactional)
- create consumer
- bind handler to consumer.Listener
in the handler we do the following:
- handle message
- grab reference to
Hey Guys,
I'm new to ActiveMQ and am running into a problem that has me
stumped. We're using NMS to communicate with an ActiveMQ message
broker. After a random period of time our consumers stop receiving
messages. Our producers do not seem to have any difficulty delivering
messages.
You can view
25 matches
Mail list logo
