Re: [5.4.2] New XML config issue? Not backward compatible?

.nighttale.net > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:22 PM, benoitx wrote: >> >> Sorry to come back on this... When we set this up via Spring XML, the >> validate=false does not seem to work: >> >> >>    > class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnecti

Re: [5.4.2] New XML config issue? Not backward compatible?

Sorry to come back on this... When we set this up via Spring XML, the validate=false does not seem to work: we seem to get this: 2010-12-07 00:17:29,558 ERROR [notifiers.ConnectNotifier#?] (Wrappe

[5.4.2] New XML config issue? Not backward compatible?

Hi *, I've upgraded to 5.4.2 as we're eager to get the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2935 Unfortunately, our broker config XML which has worked since version 4 or so... now does not work... We are getting this exception at startup: 4. Initialisation Failure: Could not creat

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.4.2 released

Hi Looking forward to use 5.4.2... When is the activemq-ra jar by the way? It always seem to be a bit behind... Thanks Benoit -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-4-2-released-tp3069445p3075289.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User ma

Re: Many many "java.lang.Object cannot be cast to org.apache.activemq.command.Command"

hange (r773986) that will output the object that > cannot be cast to a Command which should help track this down. This > change will be in tonight's snapshot if that is of help to you. > > > > 2009/5/12 Benoitx : >> >> Hi >> >> We seem to receive an

Many many "java.lang.Object cannot be cast to org.apache.activemq.command.Command"

Hi We seem to receive an awful lot of "Object cannot be cast to Command" exceptions, basically every minute or so. It seems to be chaotic on Ubuntu 8.10 32b and a bit less frequent on XP or so.. This still happens even with 5.3-SNAPSHOT (April 17) What is the root cause of this? Any suggestio

Re: Cannot cast to Command...

tp://fusesource.com/ > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Benoitx wrote: > >> >> Hi >> >> We've installed our application on Ubuntu Server 8.10; our app uses &

where is activemq-ra fro 5.3-SNAPSHOT?

Hi We've installed our application on Ubuntu Server 8.10; our app uses ActiveMQ 5.2 and was well behaved so far... The Ubuntu environment seems to throw an awful lot of unhelpful messages: Could not accept connection : java.lang.Object cannot be cast to org.apache.activemq.command.Command I ha

Re: No clientID specified for connection disconnect request

let me answer my own question... the config is in an xml file... this works: vm://localhost?create=false&async=false We'll get back to the list if it re-occurs but... it seems to have fixed the clientID issue. Thanks!!! Benoit Benoitx wrote: > > Thanks a lot for this. > &

Re: No clientID specified for connection disconnect request

ound could be to turn async dispatch off in the vm:// > transport - e.g. vm://localhost?async=false > > On 8 Jul 2008, at 23:42, Benoitx wrote: > >> >> Same here. >> >> This error seems to happen on the FIRST message sent by thread in >> JBoss... >&

Re: InvalidClientID (Broker embedded in JBoss)

Hi Alex & all, We have exactly the same problem with JBoss 4.0.5 having upgraded ActiveMQ from 4.1.1 to 5.1. Has anyone found a solution / workaround? Thanks a lot Benoit Alex Soto wrote: > > Hi, > > I have ActiveMQ 5.0 running embedded in JBoss 4.2.2 using the rar > adapter. > I see the

Re: No clientID specified for connection disconnect request

Same here. This error seems to happen on the FIRST message sent by thread in JBoss... After the first message, it seems to go away... Quite annoying. Any suggestion ? Solution? workaround? Thanks Benoit Demian Mrakovich wrote: > > Just upgraded from 4.1 to 5.1 and get this exception now r

Re: Network of Brokers - Broker A talking to Broker B

I meant between 4.1.1 and 5.1.0... As you can see, we've changed 2 versions at the same time... (ActiveMQ and Mule)... never a good idea... Benoit Benoitx wrote: > > Hi Hiram, > > It seems that between 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 the exclude queues is not very > strict... > >

Re: Network of Brokers - Broker A talking to Broker B

e same version or are you mixing them? > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Benoitx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Has anyone found a solution to this? >> >> I've just upgraded from ActiveMQ 4.1.1 to 5.1.0 and suddenly all my >> network >> of br

[Mule 1.4.4] FileConnector: how to stop large or binary files?

Hi All, We are using the FileConnector mechanism to pick up files from a given directory. is there an easy way to STOP certain files from being picked up? Typically: 1/ binary files (yes or no) 2/ files where size > x bytes We seemed to think that "binary" was a property of the FileConnector b

5.1.0 Network Brokers: changes since 4.1.1?

Hi All, We’re using ActiveMQ with Mule 1.4.4-SNAPSHOT. I've just upgraded from ActiveMQ 4.1.1 to 5.1.0 and suddenly all my network of brokers keep the messages in the local queues! I think it is an issue related to the first broker not forwarding messages to the second broker as we have an old

Re: Network of Brokers - Broker A talking to Broker B

Has anyone found a solution to this? I've just upgraded from ActiveMQ 4.1.1 to 5.1.0 and suddenly all my network of brokers keep the messages in the local queues! I think it is an issue related to the first broker not forwarding messages to the second broker. We have an old 4.1.1 broker part of