jboss, glassfish, etc.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Conntecting-to-a-remote-broker-tp4664053.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Andreas Calvo Gómez
Systems Engineer
Scytl Secure Electronic Voting
Plaça Gal·la
Missing part
On 11/02/13 15:25, Andreas Calvo Gómez wrote:
Hello,
In the following scenario:
- 4 machines (A1, A2, A3 and CB1)
- 3 of them (A1, A2 and A3) under the same broadcast domain, with an
embedded broker (persistent), a local consumer (durable subscriber)
and a local producer, with
Hello,
In the following scenario:
- 4 machines (A1, A2, A3 and CB1)
- 3 of them (A1, A2 and A3) under the same broadcast domain, with an
embedded broker (persistent), a local consumer (durable subscriber) and
a local producer, with multicast enabled and static network connector
(SSL) to a centr
Mohit,
The clients will take that parameter and used it to monitor connections.
On 01/02/13 21:58, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
If I set maxInactivityDuration to 0 on server and leave clients with some
value then which overrides? Would server override client in this case?
--
Andreas Calvo Gómez
Take a look at http://activemq.apache.org/configuring-wire-formats.html
to see an example.
On 31/01/13 20:46, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Thanks! but I am not even able to add maxInactivityDuration to the uri. Is
there a workaround for that?
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Andreas Calvo Gómez
Sorry, I meant
5.1.2 on the other computer, run ant producer -Dtopic=true -Dmax=99
On 31/01/13 20:17, Andreas Calvo Gómez wrote:
5.1.2 on the other computer, run ant consumer -Dtopic=true -Dmax=99
--
Andreas Calvo Gómez
Systems Engineer
Scytl Secure Electronic Voting
Plaça Gal·la
Exception: Broker: BROKER - Client: CLIENT already
connected on URI) and pending message will not flow to reach the desired
number.
On 31/01/13 20:01, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
If this is closed I am assuming there is a workaround.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Andreas Calvo Gómez <
an
ug
files, is anyone aware of this?
It also appears others either disable it or increase the inactivity
period
as workaround.
--
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta
--
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta
-
Hello,
We are facing a behavior where subscribers' Pending Queue Size
increases, it seems that no ACKs are dispatched and flow ratio decreases
almost to zero.
Our topology is somehow peculiar:
We have several places, each one containing multiple machines.
Each machine has a local broker with a
Wrong link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3353
El vie 07 sep 2012 11:57:12 CEST, Andreas Calvo escribió:
Hi,
We are still affected by this issue.
Taking a look at the code, it seems that upon undesired disconnection
and reconnection, all durable subscribers affected are lost.
Using
Hi,
We are still affected by this issue.
Taking a look at the code, it seems that upon undesired disconnection
and reconnection, all durable subscribers affected are lost.
Using JMX we're able to see how the NC is lost and not successfully
recreated.
However, we've identified that even standa
Hi,
I want to create a small application that listens in a specific topic
and react if some consumer request either a missing message or all
transmitted messages.
This comes because using ActiveMQ along with retroactive consumer is
limited to the subscription recovery policy, which cannot be un
Hi,
Is it possible to update the list of running brokers for another brokers?
Taking the next scenario:
consumer/producer 1 < - > embedded broker 1 < - > broker A < - > broker B <
- > embedded broker 1 < - > consumer/producer 2
The main goal is to give a list of running brokers to embedded broke
Thank you for answering.
This is the scenario:
(embedded) broker A <---> standalone broker B <---> (embedded) broker C
it is a hub-and-spoke network of brokers, so broker B gets and dispatches
all messages.
we start establishing the connection for all the brokers and start sending
messages from
We've been playing a little bit more, and we faced another issue.
Having a network of brokers, two of them embedded on a java application
connect to a central standalone activemq server, when we disconnect one of
the embedded brokers from the network, it does not get the pending messages
from the
Attached to JIRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3353
However, we've found that closing the session and reopening it solves the
problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Durable-subscriptions-not-surviving-network-disconnect-tp3586149p364827
This JUnit test reproduces the error: http://pastebin.com/RXCVHzGt
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Durable-subscriptions-not-surviving-network-disconnect-tp3586149p3646615.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I've started a JUnit Test case.
Since it's the first time, it's not clean, may be buggy and the behavior is
not what I really expected, but maybe it's a start.
org.apache.activemq.usecases.DurableSubscriberWithNetworkDisconnectTest:
http://pastebin.com/kr9uu0uE
--
View this message in context:
Thanks Gary.
I'm using ConnectionInfo and RemoveInfo to detect (re)connections.
However, I'm trying to tell the client to (re)subscribe againt to the topic,
like if I restarted the whole client, but it's not working.
I've been playing with TransportListener and some advisory message (don't
know w
Sorry for the late response.
There is already a Jira issue
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3353).
While I do know how to reproduce it using multicast brokers and producer and
consumer from the example directory, I do not know how to make a junit case.
If it's not difficult, I could try
Same here.
Seems to be a common problem with latest activemq versions
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-3353-Durable-subscribers-on-durable-topics-don-t-receive-messages-after-network-disconnect-tp3582806p3619480.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing
We've been stuck with the same problem (in a different scenario).
We've tried to replicate the same behavior using the examples on activemq
(ant producer, ant consumer, and static-network-broker), and, as Joe said,
the activemq seems to reconnect just fine, but the clients get stuck.
--
View this
I'm trying to get a simple embedded broker to connect thru multicast.
However, after the consumer starts receiving messages, if a network problem
happens (I disconnect the host from the network), the connection from the
client to the embedded broker never recovers.
So, it stops getting all the new
23 matches
Mail list logo