Re: High cardinality queues

2020-07-28 Thread Alec Henninger
essage Grouping" chapter. > > > Justin > > [1] > > http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/message-grouping.html > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 9:52 AM Alec Henninger > wrote: > > > Right, succinctly the scenario is: > > > &g

Re: High cardinality queues

2020-07-26 Thread Alec Henninger
ting. > > To reduce overheads in general consider settings that will enable automatic > housekeeping - set message TTL to a low value, and consider auto creating > and deleting of addresses which is the default. > > > Dave > > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020, 7:21 PM Alec Henni

Re: High cardinality queues

2020-07-25 Thread Alec Henninger
many consumers, creating queues. On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 2:11 PM Alec Henninger wrote: > Hello, > > I'm wondering about the overhead of queues (addresses) in Artemis. > > Thinking about ordering messages, we can use groups. But queues (with a > single consumer) are alre

High cardinality queues

2020-07-25 Thread Alec Henninger
Hello, I'm wondering about the overhead of queues (addresses) in Artemis. Thinking about ordering messages, we can use groups. But queues (with a single consumer) are already ordered. Could we instead use many individual queues? Message groups are (at least given the documentation example) suita

Re: Artemis 2.6.0 - Why AMQPMessage does not implements getDuplicateProperty()?

2018-06-03 Thread Alec Henninger
Oops, autocorrect. Meant "They *may provide you a supported patch then." On Sun, Jun 3, 2018, 7:54 AM Alec Henninger wrote: > Damir, if you have a Red Hat subscription you may have some luck opening a > case on the customer portal about your use case and problem. They have

Re: Artemis 2.6.0 - Why AMQPMessage does not implements getDuplicateProperty()?

2018-06-03 Thread Alec Henninger
Damir, if you have a Red Hat subscription you may have some luck opening a case on the customer portal about your use case and problem. They have provide you a supported patch then. On Sat, Jun 2, 2018, 8:32 PM Damir Murat wrote: > I'm pretty new in AMQP, but you can point me to some resources,

Re: Broker Federation with an Active-Active Broker Cluster

2017-12-06 Thread Alec Henninger
Isn't network of brokers an active-active cluster? On Tue, Dec 5, 2017, 5:21 PM Tim Bain wrote: > Not with ActiveMQ 5.x, since it doesn't have a capacity to do an > active-active cluster, but ActiveMQ Artemis can. Have you looked at it? > > Tim > > On Dec 5, 2017 7:28 AM, "andi welchlin" wrote:

Re: Replication and client transactions

2017-02-19 Thread Alec Henninger
> > Woops, thought the list was Artemis specific. Yes I'm using Artemis in this > example. > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017, 1:38 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > > > Are you using ActiveMQ Artemis? > > > > > > Justin > > > > - Original Message - &g

Re: Replication and client transactions

2017-02-18 Thread Alec Henninger
Woops, thought the list was Artemis specific. Yes I'm using Artemis in this example. On Sat, Feb 18, 2017, 1:38 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > Are you using ActiveMQ Artemis? > > > Justin > > - Original Message - > From: "Alec Henninger" > To: use

Replication and client transactions

2017-02-18 Thread Alec Henninger
Hi all, Given I have a broker with for example two backups, configured with journal replication (not shared storage), is there a way to guarantee a message has successfully replicated before completing a write? Does this happen automatically, or is configuration necessary to achieve this? Is it