Sorry, forgot the stack trace:
Caused by: javax.jms.JMSException: Peer (vm://localhost#1) disposed.
at
org.apache.activemq.util.JMSExceptionSupport.create(JMSExceptionSupport.java:62)
~[activemq-core-5.4.2.jar:5.4.2]
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.doAsyncSendPacket(Acti
Hello,
it seems my transports are disposing now and then for no apparent reason.
Erratically, I get an JMSException Peer (vm://localhost#1) disposed.
I got inspired here
(http://forum.springsource.org/archive/index.php/t-39820.html) to to change
my transport definition from vm://localhost to tc
Hello Dejan,
> but you cannot have a slave broker in an active Tomcat instance.
thanks. That is what was troubling me. An identical config with standalone
brokers worked.
Is there any specific reason why embedded brokers and master/slave are not
orthogonal? Did I miss this somewhere in the do
I have MySQL 5.1, I have InnoDB-Tables, but Slaves do not start up. The first
process becomes master. The others block while trying to become master. They
never become slaves. They try to execute
SELECT * FROM ACTIVEMQ_LOCK FOR UPDATE.
This waits for the lock to be available and finally ends w
Hello everyone,
I have a cluster of tomcats. I use Spring 3. I need to distribute some load
across the nodes. I want to use JMS for that and ActiveMQ for JMS.
As far as I have read, failover with master/slave should me the way to go
for me. Maybe I am already wrong there?
1) I do not want any
