Re: avoiding oom-killer on Artemis

2025-01-09 Thread Justin Bertram
It's not clear to me what the Google Cloud monitoring agent is doing behind the scenes so it's hard to comment on how it will compare, but it's worth noting that some metrics (e.g. those related to Netty buffer pools) are reported to, for example, Prometheus, but are not reported via JMX. Therefore

Re: avoiding oom-killer on Artemis

2025-01-09 Thread david kerns
just a side note: the Linux OOM-KILLER kills every/any process that requests more than 1 byte than is available... it can wreak havoc, but usually, gets the actual memory hog soon enough. On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 12:08 AM Vilius Šumskas wrote: > That what I was afraid of :). OK I guess we will hav

RE: Artemis journal compacting when password masking enabled

2025-01-09 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Found it. It looks like ${broker.instance}/bin/artemis have changed recently and artemis-utility.profile was not accounted for when running CLI commands. Updated bin/artemis script from clean Artemis instance installation and now it works. These changes should be mentioned on https://activemq.

Re: Artemis journal compacting when password masking enabled

2025-01-09 Thread Domenico Francesco Bruscino
Hi Vilius, passing -Dartemis.default.sensitive.string.codec.key=myKey in artemis-utility.properties should work unless you are using a custom password-codec. Could you share the steps to reproduce this issue? Thanks, Domenico On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 at 08:34, Vilius Šumskas wrote: > Hello, > > I’m

Question Regarding SNI configuration in jetty.xml for AMQ Classic

2025-01-09 Thread Chitranshu Changdar
Hi, Need some help with AMQ Classic configurations for HTTPS connection using the ssl certificate. At first, I was facing with issue with jetty.xml configuration for ssl connection, but that was resolved with the help of AMQ-9405. For this to work with https we must generate brokers.ks with spec