Re: ActiveMQ 6.x, STOMP via WebSocket, No factory for Upgrade: websocket in ServerConnector

Hi Thanks for the update. As it's on the client side, I don't think we have to change anything on the STOMP transport broker side. Regards JB On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 6:16 PM Ruediger Gad wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been looking into this longer than I'd like to admit. xD > Just after sending the q

Re: Question regarding problems with JDBC persistence

Based on the information you provided I can say that the problem isn't what I originally expected. Here's how the data breaks down per record type: - Add (11) - Set scheduled delivery time (36): 376,143,458 - Update delivery count(34): 290,102 - Add Transactional (13) - Add message (45): 63

RE: VirtualSelectorCacheBrokerPlugin - expiration of selectors ?

Hello, Could anyone confirm my analysis or indicate if I'm doing something wrong here ? Thanks! Nicolas -Message d'origine- De : CASAUX Nicolas Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2024 17:27 À : users@activemq.apache.org Objet : RE: VirtualSelectorCacheBrokerPlugin - expiration of selectors ? H

Re: Question regarding problems with JDBC persistence

Thanks for the reply Justin. After restoring the database in its original state I ran counts on recordType/userRecordType and got this: recordType userRecordType   count(*) 11 36 376143458 11 34 290102 13    45 63893 14    32 63893 18    255 22941 17