Hello Team
Please find the error I am facing:
2023-11-21 10:45:41,583 INFO [org.apache.activemq.artemis] AMQ241004:
Artemis Console available at http://localhost:8162/console
2023-11-21 10:45:50,424 WARN [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server]
AMQ222137: Unable to announce backup, retrying
or
Hi Adrija,
this mailing list doesn't support attachments so your files and screenshot
didn't come through. Please cut and paste the error logs instead.
Regards,
Domenico
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 16:37, Adrija Basu wrote:
> Hello Team
>
> Can you please assist on the below query
>
> Thanks And Re
Hello Team
Can you please assist on the below query
Thanks And Regards
Adrija
On Mon, 20 Nov, 2023, 19:45 Adrija Basu, wrote:
> Hello Team
>
> I am trying to setup HA and failover using shared store policy on centos7
> local vm for that I created the master and slave broker using the following
You are right, that was the initial plan. But, as both Artemis and
ActiveMQ are active, with active communities, we decided to be back on
our "regular" versioning at ActiveMQ. So ActiveMQ "Classic" will use
6,7,8,9,10, ... versioning, Artemis can do the same, so we have two
different subprojects.
I didn't realize you were using such an old version. The --java-memory
parameter was added back in 2.25.0 via ARTEMIS-3928 [1] which was released
over a year ago now.
In any case, the --java-options parameter should work for you. See
Domenico's answer for more details on why.
Justin
[1] https:/
Hi Shivang,
even if the argument of --java-options is appended, those java options are
applied in place of the previous values defined in JAVA_ARGS because of how
java parses the command line options. You can check the running heap memory
values using java.lang.Memory, i.e.
curl -H "Origin:http:/
Thanks for the clarification.
>From my knowledge there was a plan to “rename” Artemis as Classic.
>From [1]
“Once Artemis reaches a sufficient level of feature parity with the "Classic"
code-base it will become the next major version of ActiveMQ.”
It means will be ActiveMQ 7?
[1] https://active
Hello,
Any chance to confirm that this is an actual issue ?
The related side-effects seem important to me (selectors not applied because
messages on temp etc…)
Regards,
Nicolas
C2 – Usage restreint
De : CASAUX Nicolas
Envoyé : mercredi 15 novembre 2023 11:43
À : users@activemq.apache.org
Ob
Hi
No ActiveMQ 6.0.0 is not Artemis. It’s ActiveMQ « classic » updated.
For me, Artemis and ActiveMQ are two projects in the ActiveMQ umbrella,
each with its own roadmap and release cycle.
Regards
JB
Le lun. 20 nov. 2023 à 08:52, Modanese, Riccardo
a écrit :
> Hello,
> good news!
>
> So A
