RE: [EXTERNAL]:AMQP "applicationProperties" prefix

2023-08-21 Thread Steigerwald, Aaron
Please disregard my original question. I can see what's happening and how the prefix is used. Thank you, Aaron -Original Message- From: Steigerwald, Aaron Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 9:08 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL]:AMQP "applicationProperties" prefix [You d

AMQP "applicationProperties" prefix

2023-08-21 Thread Steigerwald, Aaron
Hello, Is there any way to prevent Artemis from prepending "applicationProperties" to AMQP message application properties keys? I see the toPropertyMap method in https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/main/artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis

Re: Problem with Artemis upgrade in versions 2.29.0+

2023-08-21 Thread Justin Bertram
See the website [1] for details about how to get a Jira account. I'll be looking for your request and will approve it quickly. Justin [1] https://activemq.apache.org/issues#using-the-issue-tracker On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 3:23 AM MILOVIDOV Aleksandr < aleksandr.milovi...@raiffeisen.ru> wrote: >

Re: Pre-authentication with Broker

2023-08-21 Thread Justin Bertram
Can you elaborate on the nature of the bottleneck which is preventing new, good connections, etc.? Is it related to CPU, network bandwidth, or something internal to the code, etc.? By default the broker caches the result of both successful and failed authentication in order to reduce strain on the

RE: Problem with Artemis upgrade in versions 2.29.0+

2023-08-21 Thread MILOVIDOV Aleksandr
> Can you create a JIRA? it is definitely a bug. I'm new to ASF projects, and currently I don't have an authorization to create issues. If someone could create an issue, it would be great. -- Best regards, Aleksandr --- This message and any attachment are confi

RE: Pre-authentication with Broker

2023-08-21 Thread MILOVIDOV Aleksandr
Hi, We also have problem with misconfigured clients which cause error logs on the server, mostly in test environments. It seems that it has no impact on other clients in our test lab. I don't know how to solve it, but maybe you can try to use some external authentication mechanism (maybe on some