Or you / we could add a new method with the old semantic with a clear doc
about it.
Alrhoufht I’m not sure what good is to keep the consumer leaking.
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 10:53 AM Justin Bertram wrote:
> The behavior you're seeing is expected at this point given the fix for
> ARTEMIS-4234 [1
The behavior you're seeing is expected at this point given the fix for
ARTEMIS-4234 [1]. The capabilities of the JUnit resources are very basic,
and it doesn't really make sense to make them support more complex
use-cases when the client API already does this. Therefore you just need to
create your
