Re: ActiveMQ "Classic" ACL and VirtualTopics

2023-05-26 Thread John D. Ament
Hi Matt, So yeah that's pretty much what I'm trying to figure out as well, or more specifically why it is looking for that pattern instead of the actual configured pattern. To better explain the scenario, there's 2 versions of the app, V1 & V2. They look like this: V1: - Consumes from Consum

Re: ActiveMQ "Classic" ACL and VirtualTopics

2023-05-26 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi John- The error message seems to indicate the app is using a wild card subscription (or getting one encoded funny), but the authz is named to a specific destinations \u003e = “>" What you have should work fine, but there seems to be a coordination problem. Either the authz needs the “>” wi

ActiveMQ "Classic" ACL and VirtualTopics

2023-05-26 Thread John D. Ament
Hi there We're on "Classic" 5.17.2 and use VirtualTopics pretty heavily, due to some external constraints can't use Artemis quite yet. I was wondering, is there any guidance on setting up ACLs with VirtualTopics? Originally when we setup the connection, the application was connecting and consumi

Unexpected message order after JMSContext.recover()

2023-05-26 Thread Moritz Heine
Hello, I've observed a somewhat unexpected behavior of message delivery after a recover with the following setup: - Artemis broker (tested with 2.24.0 and 3.0.0) - JMSConsumer (shared durable) *C* with *ActiveMQJMSConstants.INDIVIDUAL_ACKNOWLEDGE* - JMSProducer (shared durable) *P*