Thanks. I submitted a pull based on your suggestion
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4368
--- Original Message ---
On Saturday, February 4th, 2023 at 7:31 PM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I think using the URI and being a property on the connection factory would
> be a good
We have a queue in our production system (on Artemis 2.27.1) that ended up
being used before it was defined in our broker.xml.
This meant that the address has the “Auto created: true” attribute, and the
queue under it ended up with “Auto delete: true” and “Configuration managed:
false”
We run
Any idea why activemq must be redelivering a message to another consumer when
the first consumer had sent acknowledgement back to activemq?
Thanks & Regards,
ADARSH NAIR
Software Engineer
NICE
(M) +91 (87) 6677-6736
adarsh.n...@nice.com
www.nice.com
-Original Message-
From: Robb
You should review yes as 5.16.5 was announced as the intended final
5.16.x release, over 9 months ago as you noted. That is why it hasnt
seen the same updates 5.17.x has during that time, any coming 5.16.6
release was not originally intended to exist.
Robbie
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 08:49, somasani
