Re: Re: pause acceptance and delivery of messages in ActiveMQ 5.16.3

2021-11-19 Thread Justin Bertram
I'm confused about the nature of your use-case. You originally said that you were using ActiveMQ 5.16.3, but in this latest email you mention intercepting things like ClusterTopologyChangeMessage_V4, CreateSessionMessage_V2, CreateSessionResponseMessage, etc. which are used exclusively by ActiveMQ

RE: Re: pause acceptance and delivery of messages in ActiveMQ 5.16.3

2021-11-19 Thread hannes bauer
Thank you very much for the possible solutions. I finally was able to try the approach with the interceptor and it works great for intercepting messages send to the broker using SessionSendMessage to filter the messages I want to intercept. Unfortunately, it does not intercept messages sent from

Re: ActiveMQ upgrade documentation

2021-11-19 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Karl- You are welcome! Let us know how it goes, I would not expect any issues for an upgrade between those versions. -Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 18, 2021, at 1:07 PM, Nordstrom, Karl wrote: > > Hello Matt, > > Thanks for the reply. Yes, I meant 5.15.12 and 5.16.3. I doubt I'll be able > to

Re: ActiveMQ upgrade documentation

2021-11-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Karl, It's possible to setup a master/slave or NoB between the "old" version and the "new" one, in order to do a "live" update. Regards JB On 18/11/2021 17:12, Nordstrom, Karl wrote: Is there documentation on how to upgrade ActiveMQ classic? I want to upgrade our test cluster from 1.15.12

Re: ActiveMQ upgrade documentation

2021-11-19 Thread Nordstrom, Karl
Tim, Thanks for pointing out that only one broker accesses the data at a time. I will do the upgrade in dev, then acceptance, before doing it in the production environment. --- Karl Nordström Systems Administrator Penn State IT | Application Platforms From:

Re: ActiveMQ upgrade documentation

2021-11-19 Thread Tim Bain
Only one ActiveMQ broker accesses the data store at a time. The passive node is simply waiting to acquire the lock but will not access the data store until the lock is acquired. Yes, it's possible to do a rolling upgrade as you described,. The downtime incurred will be minimal (just a standard fai