Re: ActiveMQ Locking down Web Console via LDAP

Looks great, thanks for sharing. Tim On Thu, May 14, 2020, 7:24 AM eleipold wrote: > With the help of this articles and a couple of others, I think I solved the > problem. Below is a blog that I wrote on it: > > > https://www.workhorseintegrations.com/2020/05/14/securing-activemq-console-with-l

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Master-Slave being DB locked both

@Tim @Jean Problem was in /etc/fstab with some errors (example, fstype 'nfs4' being deprecated) + probably app exiting wrongly. After fixing, and rebooting some nodes, since blocked seeing the same lock, everything working fine. Thanks

Re: ActiveMQ Locking down Web Console via LDAP

With the help of this articles and a couple of others, I think I solved the problem. Below is a blog that I wrote on it: https://www.workhorseintegrations.com/2020/05/14/securing-activemq-console-with-ldap/ -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: Connecting ActiveMQ Instances (Network of Brokers) with different network connectors and a reverse proxy inbetween

I haven't done this, but believe it should be possible. But I was surprised to see that your diagram only shows the use of websockets for the hop from local broker to reverse proxy, and uses TCP elsewhere. From your description, it sounded like you were intending to use websockets on all network l