Hi Tim,
The subscription is firstly client provided (and fallback to client id
if not specified).
Regards
JB
On 27/11/2019 07:59, Tim Bain wrote:
> OK, so I want to make sure I understand this correctly.
>
> You have two brokers (or is that two failover pairs?): frontend-standard-01
> and backe
OK, so I want to make sure I understand this correctly.
You have two brokers (or is that two failover pairs?): frontend-standard-01
and backend-broker-name-1. The brokers are not configured in a network of
brokers, though you're using your Camel routes to move messages between
them. You have some
This sounds like a valid bug. Could you please submit a bug report for it
in JIRA?
Thanks,
Tim
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:53 AM Viliam Durina wrote:
> I'm doing these steps:
>
> Xid xid1, xid2;
> XASession session = ...;
> MessageConsumer consumer = ...;
> XAResource xaRes = sess
Are you by any chance using CMS as your GC strategy? It's got a nasty
shortcoming where because it doesn't compact Old Gen, it's possible to have
heap fragmentation that means it's not possible to allocate contiguous
space for a large object even though there's still space free. If so, you
should c
A few things.
1) Slow consumers themselves can't be disabled. What can be enabled or
disabled is configuration for what the broker should do in response to
them. And you should definitely configure limits to protect the broker in
the event that a consumer is consistently slower than the producer i
Hi All,
Yes, we have configured the limits on memory usage in the broker settings.
We also checked the heap dump and found that still 500 MB free space
available. So what could you be the reason for OutOfMemoryError in activeMQ
Also we are monitoring the AMQ queues and there is no pending mes
Hi all,
For a short period of time there was a pre-requisites section in the
documentation stating the Java version recommended to run Artemis (
http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/1.0.0/running-server.html
) .
I can't find such info anymore. Is this documented somewhere?
I'm doing these steps:
Xid xid1, xid2;
XASession session = ...;
MessageConsumer consumer = ...;
XAResource xaRes = session.getXAResource();
xaRes.start(xid1, TMNOFLAGS);
consumer.receive();
xaRes.end(xid1, TMSUCCESS);
// prepare the xid1, continue with xid2
xaR
Dear Justin,
thanks a lot for your reply (and please keep me in CC, since I'm not subscribed
to the ActiveMQ mailing list).
By now I have tried to use a space-separated list of URLs and indeed it seems
to work. Very nice!
I guess it would be good to mention this in the documentation, wouldn
Hello all,
Has anyone managed to check this out? It seems to be a pretty major race
condition issue with large message processing.
Unfortunately I just realized that attachments get removed from e-mails, so
here are relevant thread stacks...
Stacks of 2 *deadlocked *threads:
"Thread-1074
(Active
10 matches
Mail list logo