Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

2019-11-20 Thread Tim Bain
Ashish, are you setting the clientID setting on your clients, as documented at the bottom of https://activemq.apache.org/how-do-durable-queues-and-topics-work.html? If not, then on reconnection it may be that the new connection is getting a different client ID, resulting in a different subscriber n

Re: Getting error "the client and server cannot communicate, because they do not possess a common algorithm" on .Net Framework 4.0 with TLS 1.2 settings and using Apache.NMS 1.7.1 and Apache.NMS.Activ

2019-11-20 Thread adongare
The documentation you shared did not solve my issue, however, I have resolved this issue. Below is the resolution for me for the people who will be facing this problem in the future. We need to add some query string parameters in broker URL to enable TLS 1.2 and SHA cipher support for .Net Framewo

Artemis scheduled thread pool max size

2019-11-20 Thread slx
Hello, I have a question about the effects of the the scheduled pool max size in artemis (2.10.1). I had a recurring issue with an embedded artemis instance which I had significant trouble to track down. The application stack uses a small number (3) of internal consumers do process messages, conne

Thread deadlock during message processing

2019-11-20 Thread Mario Mahovlić
Hello all, We run Artemis embedded on our Spring service and occasionally get this issue where all our producer threads become blocked so no messages can be produced to queue (happened 3 times in 2 weeks). We produce both regular and large messages to the queue. All we get during this time from ar

Re: Artemis failback doesn't work in our scenario

2019-11-20 Thread Jo Stenberg
Network pinger solves it. Thank you! -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

2019-11-20 Thread Ashish Vaishno
Hello Tim, Please find below the config Config with kahadb http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; xmlns:amq="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

2019-11-20 Thread Tim Bain
If the problem is still occurring with regular KahaDB, then KahaDB probably isn't the problem. Can you share your full broker configuration, rather than just snippets? Tim On Wed, Nov 20, 2019, 8:16 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Basically the same as you: > > ind

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

2019-11-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Basically the same as you: Let me try with AMQP client. I just commented the Jira. Regards JB On 20/11/2019 15:49, Ashish Vaishno wrote: > Hello Tim, > > I have tried to change mkahadb to standard kahadb as well in my dev > environment. I still face the same issue. > > >

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

2019-11-20 Thread Ashish Vaishno
I also created a ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7350 -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

2019-11-20 Thread Ashish Vaishno
Hello Tim, I have tried to change mkahadb to standard kahadb as well in my dev environment. I still face the same issue. I will create a JIRA bug for the same. @JB would it be possible to share your config? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

2019-11-20 Thread Tim Bain
Ashish, If you convert from mKahaDB to the standard KahaDB configuration (in a dev/test environment), does the problem disappear? If so, please write a bug in JIRA for the problem. (this mailing list thread is not sufficient to get a fix implemented). If not, we'll have to keep trying to isolate