ActiveMQ re-added old processed transactions back into enqueue

2019-06-07 Thread haCid
Hi guys, Hopefully you can help me. I have transactions that were processed and dequeued in 2018. In May 2019 I restarted the ActiveMQ instance as normal, and after it came up, it somehow re-added those dequeued messages back into the enqueued queue. Has this happened to anyone else? I have

Re: Artemis: DLQ not working with Core

2019-06-07 Thread Justin Bertram
If you don't ack the message the broker doesn't know that the client has actually tried to consume the message. It will just assume it sat in the client's buffer and was never actually seen and that doesn't qualify as a failed delivery. Justin On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 1:26 AM Bummer wrote: > Got

Re: Artemis 2.7.0 - Shared Store cluster - RHEL guest/WIN host VMs - Failover not working

2019-06-07 Thread Justin Bertram
It may work as expected, but to my knowledge it's never been tested so it may not. The NullPointerException you're seeing the master's log file is more concerning than anything. I'm not sure why that would happen. Can you reproduce this on 2.9.0 [1]? I'm in the process of releasing 2.9.0 now. The

Re: Sporadic "Error while attempting to add new Connection to the pool; nested exception is javax.jms.JMSException: Could not connect to broker URL: tcp://localhost:61616. Reason: java.net.BindExcepti

2019-06-07 Thread cooshal
Hi again: I looked futher into this issue. It is strange that, something seems to be wrong with my camel route bundles. Initially, I was not able to replicate this issue on a different system. Then, I used my camel routes bundle that was built 2 weeks ago. And, now I see plenty of connections. I

Re: Artemis 2.7.0 - Shared Store cluster - RHEL guest/WIN host VMs - Failover not working

2019-06-07 Thread hannibal
Hi Justin, I added all missing parts. Regarding FS lock, if logs are trustworthy, I can see on the master node: 2019-06-05 08:35:47,492 INFO [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server] AMQ221035: Live Server Obtained live lock So I'm assuming the lock is working. On slave I can see: 2019-06-05