We are currently facing the same issue with the compare algorithm in our
organizarion. Is there an ETA on the fix?
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Hi, I am having an issue with the MatchComparator implemented in the
HierarchicalObjectRepository class.
Let me put an example on what's going on right now:
I have created a class called DynamicRolesSecuritySettingPlugin implementing
the interface SecuritySettingPlugin so that I can implement the
Hi Tim,
Tks for your reply.
Ok for Config 2 not recommended but I agree config 1 and 3 should behave the
same.
I'm not using durable subscriptions, no persistency at all, only classic bus
capabilities.
I'm performing the same tests for all configuration and have clearly some
different results.
The plugin will discard any message that would have gone to the specified
DLQ instead of putting it on the DLQ.
>From your description, I think what you want is
(source: http://activemq.apache.org/message-redelivery-and-dlq-handling.html
)
Tim
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, 3:38 AM Bob wrote:
> Hi Tim,
Config 2 isn't recommended, but configs 1 and 3 are both valid and should
behave equivalently. The fact that they don't is concerning.
Is your 2000-message test the same thing as your stress test, or are those
different tests? If they're different, can you please give more details
about how the 20
Hi guys,
I'm facing a very strange problem. I tested multiple versions of ACTIVEMQ
and I'm still seeing this issue on 5.15.9.
The setup is the following.
I have component which exposes a service interface with one basic method
which only perform a println. The exporter reads either a queue or a
