Thanks for your feedbacks.
michael:
I was already aware that some products use this broker out of the shelf, and
so a few posts on its use so this is no surprise to me. My question was not
about the maturity of artemis nor its ability to be installed and used in
production environment, but was re
We need to review the migration guide. Dejan did a good one. We need to
review it now.
I’m actively working on making 2.7.0 out. If someone can help on that
front it would be great.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 12:47 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
> I'm not sure if there is enough information about user
I'm not sure if there is enough information about user choices to
extrapolate a "trend," per se. My recommendation would be to look at the
features and performance you need now as well as those you expect to need
in the future and make a decision based on that.
What exactly do you mean by, "...th
So Artemis is fully production ready, it has install base in production
environments the org i work for being example.Also it is used in eclipse paho,
and jboss wildfly so has install bases where those are used as well.Two vendors
i know of are also supplying enterprise support.Redhat with AMQ7
Hi,
I would like to know what is the current "trend" on selecting artemis or
activemq for new products.
I can see the following : "The overall objective for working toward feature
parity between ActiveMQ 5.x and Artemis is for Artemis to eventually become
ActiveMQ 6.x." (http://activemq.apache.org
