That makes sense, Tim. Thanks for the clarification.
Justin
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:31 PM Timothy Bish wrote:
> On 2/21/19 10:24 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
> > I looked at the code for the javax.jms.Connection implementation in
> > ActiveMQ 5 and it wasn't clear to me what would have been blo
On 2/21/19 10:24 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
I looked at the code for the javax.jms.Connection implementation in
ActiveMQ 5 and it wasn't clear to me what would have been blocking in the
call to start(). Artemis supports the OpenWire protocol so you can still
use the 5.x client. If you use the 5.x
I looked at the code for the javax.jms.Connection implementation in
ActiveMQ 5 and it wasn't clear to me what would have been blocking in the
call to start(). Artemis supports the OpenWire protocol so you can still
use the 5.x client. If you use the 5.x client with Artemis does it block?
I'd be cur
Hi,
I tried the same example (after changing the contextfactory) with ActiveMQ
(version 5.15.8) and the main program does not exit. That is the reason I
expected the same behavior from ActiveMQ Artemis. If that is not defined in
the JMS spec I will follow other ways you have suggested to prevent t
I believe you're seeing the expected behavior. A queue's fundamental
semantics are first-in-first-out (i.e. FIFO). Using message grouping
doesn't change those semantics. The first 100 messages in the queue (which
all belong to the same group) must be dispatched before the 101st message
is dispatche
Hello,
I have a task where I need to establish a connection between an ActiveMQ
queue and a .Net application. I am using the AMQP.Net Lite plugin for this.
But I have a need for the receiver of the .Net application to be called the
moment the message goes into the queue.
Is there any solution wher
Good day,
Protocol: STOMP
auto-create-queues, auto-create-addresses
Steps to reproduce:
1. Run two consumers which subscribe to the `test` queue ['ack': 'client',
'subscription-type': 'ANYCAST'] which are in the infinite loop take a
message from a queue, wait for 1 second and then send ACK.
2. Pu
You could use a countdown latch that then when you wish to shutdown you simply
from another thread countdown.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
Original message From: Riyafa Abdul Hameed
Date: 21/02/2019 14:06 (GMT+00:00) To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: JMS
Asynch
I've never seen or heard of javax.jms.Connection.start() blocking in that
respect, and the JMS specification doesn't describe the behavior you
expect. I think such behavior would be problematic in many use-cases (e.g.
when you don't want to block). The whole point behind using a
MessageListener is
Hi,
I have the following asynchronous receiver for ActiveMQ Artemis:
https://gist.github.com/riyafa/7b0e5814286c60edb157f9a83fb64765
Here what I would expect when I call queueConn.start(); is that I want the
thread to wait to receive messages. I mean I don't want the main to exit
causing the pro
hi,I am confused by a question.
I send messages with spring-jms producer,the activemq server works most
normally,but some pendingmessages can't be confused by consumers unitil I
reboot the activemq server.
os:suse
activemq version:activemq 5.9.0
client version:spring-jms 4.1.4 spring 3.2.4
Any one
11 matches
Mail list logo
