Re: Migratiion of Queue data from HornetQ to Artemis 2.x

2018-01-31 Thread Erich Duda
Hi, there are bugs in Artemis 2.4 which are fixed in master and they are not released yet. However release of Artemis 2.5 should be soon, see [1]. Erich [1] http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-HEADS-UP-Release-Time-Artemis-td4735712.html Dňa 01.02.2018 o 08:36 dharmendra napísal

Re: Migratiion of Queue data from HornetQ to Artemis 2.x

2018-01-31 Thread dharmendra
Hi , today i tried the same on production server means export form hornetq 2.4.x messages and try to import that file using artemis 2.4 import command as given in above discussion. All of sudden i am getting this error $ ./artemis.cmd data imp --port 5445 --input "C:\SG\ArtimisMQ\hornetq_msg.xml

Re: Static network of brokers with not all brokers running (expected)

2018-01-31 Thread pypen
Thank Tim. I thought maybe the way I phrased the questions came across offensive or something. And thanks for the clarification about the polling vs. broadcasting. I will have to see if we can maybe enable multicast. I don't see the "backup" property on the discovery transport though and I am not

Re: Static network of brokers with not all brokers running (expected)

2018-01-31 Thread Tim Bain
On Jan 30, 2018 2:20 PM, "pypen" wrote: Bad day? Relax Tim. Not trying to offend anyone here. I wasn't intending for the response to come across sharply; sorry that it did. It's not about me not wanting to tweak the log4j. I just didn't want to suppress the TransportDisposedIOException (or Dem

Re: Active MQ Automatically Getting Restarted

2018-01-31 Thread Tim Bain
The JVM uses a GC strategy even if you don't explicitly pick one; that's why you don't have to explicitly free your heap variables in Java like you do in C++. It's probably Parallel if you haven't customized it, but you should check that. If I recall correctly, JConsole and/or JVisualVM might tell

Re: [ARTEMIS 2.4] Question: Message grouping and selectors

2018-01-31 Thread Archibald
Thanks for the explanation, my workaround is to have only one consumer without selector and delegate accordingly in the onMessage() method. I was just wondering whether this behaviour is done-by-design or should potentially work. Br, A. -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Act

Re: [ARTEMIS 2.4] Question: Message grouping and selectors

2018-01-31 Thread Michael André Pearce
Hi Could I suggest you use a JMS topic, which each of the consumers being a durable shared consumer where you use a separate consumer subscription for each filter. The issue I think you are hitting is that with a JMS Queue the is only a one core created and with message groups per group only o