Re: Lost messages.

Exact. The consumer which had the 2 messages is the one which is supposed to get the 5 messages. It's a consumer-broker created by another cloud service supposed to consume the 5 messages sent. It looks like the 2nd consumer with the 3 messages is created by the producer. But 5 messages have been

Re: [DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the ActiveMQ project roadmap

The documentation does talk about those things. Migration guide is just a quick guide on how to migrate but it does not replace the documentation. There was some good suggestions you made here as to tools to move configuration automatically. But that’s not a requirement to make any progress. We

Re: [DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the ActiveMQ project roadmap

On Nov 21, 2017 3:00 PM, "Clebert Suconic" wrote: > Another thought - having both brokers long term seems redundant as there is > a huge amount of overlap, and I believe the intent (please correct me if > this is wrong) is eventually to have Artemis superset all of the *key* > functionality from

Re: Lost messages.

OK, so you've sent 5 messages to the queue, and they've been round-robined across the two consumers, so one consumer got three messages and one got two. Apparently the consumer you're looking at is the one that got two messages, but the key here is that the other three messages weren't lost, they w

Re: Lost messages.

Hello, Please find more details. Actually, all the messages are sent to the Queue (starting with uuid_ in the screenshot below) but 3 are automatically queued and only 2 (instead of 5) are available to the consumer (not starting with uuid_ in the screenshot below). We're using the version 5.14.5

Re: Messages lost.

Hi Tim, Thanks for your update on my issue. Sorry I've duplicated the messages. I'm removing this one and I've answered your questions in the following thread. http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Lost-messages-td4733147.html Thanks again. -AEB -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nab

Re: Lost messages.

Hi, The message is persistent. See the screenshot for more details on the configuration we've implemented: We're sending messages to the ActiveMQ queue through a Cloud service. Thanks, AEB -- Sent from: http://activemq.228332

Apache Artemis MQTT

Hi everyone, Sorry for the inconvinience, but I didn't found the information I need in the documentation. I'm trying to see if the Apache Artemis has two particular features: - A feature like shared subscription (MQTT version 5), or consumer session balancing from vernemq. Do you know if t

[Artemis] Detect slow consumers stop being slow

Dear community, I already have health monitor for ActiveMQ 5.x, and trying to do similar for Artemis. One of the main features is to notify when there's a slow consumer, and also notify when a consumer stops being slow consumer. For 5.x, I used JMX to query for SlowConsumer=true properties (if an

Re: jaasAuthenticationPlugin ans sslContext in karaf

Hi all, more precision. For there is a bug when we use my configuration. I used the latest activeMq 5.15.2 I put my netbeans in debug mode. Inside the JaasCertificateAuthenticationBroker class, on addConnection the info.getTransportContext() return null, will a X509Certificate[] is expected. I a

Re: jaasAuthenticationPlugin ans sslContext in karaf

Hi Tim, I have more explanation but not the solution!!! I found this bug: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ENTMQ-1154 it's the same behavior for my point. I use (for my test) only activemq 5.15.1 (the latest 5.15.2 zip file is corrupt!) in standalone (without Karaf) I reproduce the issue! I use q