Re: [DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the ActiveMQ project roadmap

2017-11-17 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 2017-11-15 07:59, Justin Bertram wrote: > Ultimately I believe the decision is in the hands of the ActiveMQ PMC [1]. The question you asked is a good one and something that the PMC should clarify for the user community, especially given the confusion amongst the different projects under t

Re: [Artemis] Invalid keys during XA Recovery from HornetQ client

2017-11-17 Thread Justin Bertram
> Is there any possibility to define a separate connector (server or client side, does not matter in our use case) used for XA Recovery? I don't think so, but it's been awhile since I looked at that bit of code in HornetQ. I think you could disable recovery by setting false on the pooled-connecti

Re: [Artemis] Invalid keys during XA Recovery from HornetQ client

2017-11-17 Thread Benjamin Buehlmann
The client receives the properties of the cluster connection configured on the serverside. Is there any possibility to define a separate connector (server or client side, does not matter in our use case) used for XA Recovery? Deployment and configuration of the Artemis RA on every client is the la

Re: [Artemis] Invalid keys during XA Recovery from HornetQ client

2017-11-17 Thread Justin Bertram
I'd try using the Artemis JCA RA. You can build it using the /examples/features/sub-modules/artemis-ra-rar example shipped with the broker. Justin On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Benjamin Buehlmann < benjamin.buehlm...@gmail.com> wrote: > I configured a ActiveMQ Artemis 2.4.0 HA setup with re

[Artemis] Invalid keys during XA Recovery from HornetQ client

2017-11-17 Thread Benjamin Buehlmann
I configured a ActiveMQ Artemis 2.4.0 HA setup with replication and a static cluster connection of the two nodes (live- and backup node). As one of the test clients I use a JBoss EAP 6.3.2 with embedded HornetQ. Every two minutes a see a Warning in the clients log that some keys are not know by th

Re: Re-ordering of messages - Artemis

2017-11-17 Thread Gary Tully
It is interesting... the entire index is in memory, and I noticed a jmx operation that will swap the priority of a message, it just means moving it between priority lists in the in memory index[1]. Ordering would be more expensive by far, but by replacing the priority lists with some sort of ordere

Re: ActiveMQ DLQ issues

2017-11-17 Thread augustl
I also got these messages when I had a network connector setup. The setup seems similar to OP, where we had a message configured to be sent via a staticallyIncludedDestinations block, and it ended up in the DLQ with "TopicSubDiscard". Here's a full dump of one of the messages that ended up in the D