RE: How do I Set Up Multiple ActiveMQ Services on one Windows Machine

Are you in fact talking about running Apache (the web server) as your message seems to state, not Apache (the open source foundation) ActiveMQ (the JMS broker)? If so, you're on the wrong mailing list. If not, then yes, you should definitely upgrade from 4.1.2 to something produced this decade, eve

Re: Artemis HA cluster with replication

With master you are talking about the 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT? How do I have to provide the address? Is the (current) entry in the broker.xml (IP:PORT) enough? Shared storage is unfortunately no option (that is why trying to use Artemis). On Mon, May 15, 2017, Clebert Suconic wrote: > that's how it shoul

Re: Artemis 2.0 Security settings

> First is security settings did not change. If previous convention was to add > 'jms.queue' and 'jms.topic' then I think migrate command can take care of it. Agreed. However, using anycastPrefix and multicastPrefix on your acceptor won't fix your security settings. Those should be updated so

Re: Artemis 2.0 Security settings

I'm not sure what the problem is (if anything). Can you provide a reproducible test-case (e.g. based on one of the examples shipped with Artemis)? Justin - Original Message - From: "abhijith" To: users@activemq.apache.org Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 8:11:18 PM Subject: Re: Artemis 2.0

Re: Artemis 2.0 Security settings

Yes, removing prefix is one option. My queries are 1. Shouldn't migrate cover moving security setting and diverts? 2. Is anycastPrefix and multicastPrefix working correctly? On another post Justin had confirmed that adding them should resolve other things 3. Why does random address is printed w

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Artemis 1.5.5

Hello everyone, Apache Artemis 1.5.5 has just been released. We have fixed many bugs, improving performance and reliability at 1.5.5. The website has been updated at http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/ The release notes can be found at https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?vers

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Artemis 2.1.0

Hello everyone, Apache Artemis 2.1.0 has just been released. We have fixed many bugs, improving performance and reliability at 2.1.0. The website has been updated at http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/ The release notes can be found at http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/release-notes-2.1.0.html

Re: Artemis 2.0 Security settings

You could just remove the prefix from the security settings. I would use Artemis 2.1 already. I'm about to send the release announce On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 4:51 PM, abhijith wrote: > Hi, > > With 1.x we had configured security settings and topic like below > > > > > >

Artemis 2.0 Security settings

Hi, With 1.x we had configured security settings and topic like below

RE: How do I Set Up Multiple ActiveMQ Services on one Windows Machine

With my instances, I run the instance and specify STOP. So if I had a test instance at /opt/test then I would execute /opt/test/bin/test STOP. From: adnan [via ActiveMQ] [mailto:ml+s2283324n4726154...@n4.nabble.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 9:46 AM To: Billy Buzzard Subject: RE: How do I Set

Re: Run multiple ActiveMQ services on same server

Any insight to this issue? Someone must have come across such requirement -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Run-multiple-ActiveMQ-services-on-same-server-tp4725885p4726155.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: How do I Set Up Multiple ActiveMQ Services on one Windows Machine

Thank you for your response. For the most part i am able to run multiple instances of apache on a single Linux machine. As rightly identified updated the XML files with different port and able to process XML files through the MQ. But when trying to stop a specific service its always stopping the

Re: where is a producer authorized for writing to a virtual destination?

Am I right in thinking that there needs to be another instance of the AuthorizationBroker, added into the interceptor chain, added in such a manner so as to make ActiveMQ call it on the call to 'send' upon each of the destination queues? Does anyone know if / how such as thing can be done? I know

Re: where is a producer authorized for writing to a virtual destination?

The closest I have got so far to answering this myself is looking at AuthorizationBroker :: addProducer, where allowedACLs is determined via authorizationMap.getWriteACLs(info.getDestination()); ...but, I am still none the wiser, as to why this is only being called for the ingest queue and not on

where is a producer authorized for writing to a virtual destination?

I am running ActiveMQ 5.14.0, with all of the following: * the JAAS plugin - for user authentication on connection * a custom plugin - similar to authorizationPlugin - for user authorization on connection per destination * Selectors, defined in the broker config, as per http://activemq.apache.org/v