You seem to be expecting your network of brokers to behave like a cluster.
ActiveMQ doesn't support clustering; the closest we come is master/slave
groups, but only one broker is active at a time so that's completely
different. In a network of brokers, each broker is an independent entity
that con
I'm working with ActiveMQ 5.14.1 and trying to get the
camelRoutesBrokerPlugin to work with namespaces.
when I setup a routes.xml file that uses the following:
http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring";
xmlns:km="http://xsdrepo..com/messaging/esb"; >
Nice one!
1.5.1 has been released, so perhaps this release will interest you.
It's a safe move from 1.5.0 to 1.5.1.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:00 PM, mlange wrote:
> Quick reply: 1.5.0 source was easier to get atm (behind some proxies, so it's
> hard to get to git), so followed the instructions:
Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 1.5.1 has been released.
The release notes is here:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/release-notes-1.5.1.html
This release has a few bug fixes, including a fix that will be
critical of users using Paging under constant load:
[ARTEMIS-748] - AddressSize show a negati
The configuration is same; if there are some messages in the queue when I
switch, what will be the action of embedded to standalone i.e. will the
standalone version allow the process to consume the messages or will it
overwrite them?
Delivery mode is set to PERSISTENT; hence I wish to know what w
Quick reply: 1.5.0 source was easier to get atm (behind some proxies, so it's
hard to get to git), so followed the instructions: they're clear, correct
and worked like a charm.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-1-5-0-fails-to-discover-libAIO-on-Linux
Thanks;
I'll try to get the new version and try to compile the libaio and see if
that fixes this issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-1-5-0-fails-to-discover-libAIO-on-Linux-falls-back-to-NIO-tp4720184p4720195.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-BrokerFilter-a-blocking-interceptor-tp4720182p4720194.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You should be able to switch without an issue as long as your
configuration is the same between your XML config for standalone and
and your embedded config.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:42 AM, appy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using activeMQ embedded currently and would like to switch to the
> standalon
Perhaps we used a newer Linux kernel (than yours) to compile the
library and it wasn't compatible with your libc.
you could compile the library yourself from the source distribution.
I recommend you moving straight to 1.5.1 though. It's already tagged
and I made the upload today. I'm just waiting
Yes, it is blocking. The BrokerFilter class implements Broker and
simply delegates to the parent Broker so if whatever you are doing is
stuck then processing won't continue. If you were to print out a
stacktrace from inside one of those methods you will see that there
are many BrokerFilter implem
I have a RHEL 6.7 server wich has LibAIO installed, using Java 1.8.0_102
Artemis 1.4.0 finds and uses it with no problem, as this log line shows:
17:18:30,060 INFO [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server] AMQ221012:
Using AIO Journal
When I create a broker with the same parameters on the same m
We're experimenting with BrokerFilter to capture detailed info of producer,
consumer, message headers, etc., for logging and analysis, and want to be
very careful to avoid delaying or blocking the broker.
If a broker interceptor, for whatever reason, got stuck, would that block a
broker thread fro
this is the code .as authorization plugin
private void validateIfCreationDateIsExpired(long now, long creationDate)
{
if (now > creationDate + this.minutesToExpire * 6) {
String creationDateAsString = DATE_FORMAT.format(new
Date(creationDate));
String nowAsString = DAT
Hello,
I am using activeMQ embedded currently and would like to switch to the
standalone version. Can I use both of them simultaneously; switching in
between them on the fly?
How will this affect KahaDB if the Queues and Topics are the same?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2
We implemented a filter in activemq to validate messages from the date
sended, and we are having more issues in 5.13.2 than in 5.8, has the
filter implementation changed so much?
16 matches
Mail list logo