activemq : apache-activemq-5.14.0
jconsole using jdk1.7
I have started the activemq which comes with the jetty server. Minor change
to make the jmx enable is just change default is false(activemq.xml) --- I am using the
latest version 5.14.0
when i start i am seeing the message
JMX consoles
Thanks,
that was it. For some reason, I thought I had to set the element
on a core configuration, but I've added that the the JMS configuration and
it works fine.
Mitchell
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-memory-leak-with-local-queue-consumer
I was going to write a JIRA enhancement request for that when I had some
free time, but if you have time to write it before I get to it, that would
be fine. Please put the link here if you do.
On Sep 22, 2016 9:00 AM, "lichtin" wrote:
> Changing trace levels and using the debugger is not always
My reading of your configuration indicates that you're actually creating the
extra queue yourself. When you configure a JMS queue like this:
This gets turned into a core queue named "jms.queue.interServerQueue" mapped to
an core address also named "jms.queue.interServerQue
Hi,
I have a scenario where I have a queue, interServerQueue, for which I create
a local connection and consumer. The queue is sent messages by local and
remote producers. Messages sent to the queue are received and processed by
the local consumer.
A heap dump, however, shows 2 QueueImpl object
Ok, so I hooked up jconsole and looked at the queues, all of the queues
were showing zero. Right underneath the queues there was a section that
said "RecoveredXaTransaction". It had one entry
XID_[1096044365_globalId&3132362e392e312e3133392e746. There
really is not very much more informat
Changing trace levels and using the debugger is not always an option in
production.
I'm wondering why we could not revive the "KahaDBJournalReader" tool
from https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MB-756 and ship it with ActiveMQ.
Tim Bain wrote
> Alternatively, you all could run the KahaDB file analysi
You're hitting one of a two possible problems.
Most likely, you need to enable the replayWhenNoConsumers option described
in the Stuck Messages section of
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html.
You could also be hitting the max allowable number of times the message can
be forwarded
Apparently you can scratch the "but not impossible" bit from my reply.
Thanks Tim, I didn't know it wasn't allowed.
On Sep 22, 2016 7:07 AM, "Tim Bain" wrote:
> Topics will only hold onto messages if 1) a consumer is currently
> connected but hasn't consumed the messages, or 2) a consumer subscr
Topics will only hold onto messages if 1) a consumer is currently connected
but hasn't consumed the messages, or 2) a consumer subscribed durably but
is now disconnected. #1 indicates a slow (or intentionally misbehaving)
consumer, and isn't likely to be a problem over the span of time you're
desc
I have been working with Savoir Tech and have been very happy. Super
knowledgeable and very responsive.
http://www.savoirtech.com/
> On Sep 22, 2016, at 6:35 AM, ActiveMQ Investigation
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for alternatives available for Enterprise level 24/7 Production
> Su
hello guys
this is my first post
i want to ask about activemq
i have 2 broker instances
i sent queue to broker A,now there is 1000 in broker A.
when i activate (turn on) the consumer(the consumer had a method failover)
the queue started to be consumed by the consumer, after that i turn off
(discone
On 09/22/2016 08:39 AM, Steve Hill wrote:
After the comment about the TOPIC I decided to take a quick look at
that in the web interface (just to make sure nothing had gone awry)
In deed one of our "queues" had been created as a topic, not sure why
as we use the same code to connect to the queu
Hello,
I am looking for alternatives available for Enterprise level 24/7 Production
Support. I have seen Support Page on ActiveMQ web but would like to see what
other support options are available in market. Specially UK time.
SLAs are important along with proactive approach to solving a support
After the comment about the TOPIC I decided to take a quick look at that
in the web interface (just to make sure nothing had gone awry) In deed
one of our "queues" had been created as a topic, not sure why as we use
the same code to connect to the queues however once removed most of the
data f
I am looking for a best practice to communicate between a central system
and several remote systems that are only connected for certain time periods.
The remote system sends logs to the central system, the central system
can dispatch batch jobs running on the remote system. The job should
send
Chris/Tim:
Thanks for the ideas. Unfortunately neither are the case in our situation.
The web client shows 0 messages in any of our queues and we are not using
topics. We did set up the remote debug port and downloaded the source code if
there is anything useful to further troubleshoot that
17 matches
Mail list logo