Hi,
I have a scenario which looks very much like a server memory leak when using
STOMP protocol. I've upgraded (from HornetQ) to the latest ArtemisMQ 1.4.0,
and the same behaviour is exhibited in both products.
I have a server with a topic:
to which I create a STOMP
Hi , I am having the same type of issue but with the different configuration.
I have two brokers which are not in network but i am using producer and
consumer with two different threads in my local and trying to hit 10k
messages and consume it from second thread. I am using the shared file
storage
I have an HA cluster (currently version 5.13.3) using replicated leveldb and
I want to put the cluster behind an F5 so that clients only need to know the
VIP on the F5, and the F5 forwards the client to the current live "master".
This way, if I change my broker topology (e.g. add another HA cluster
On 09/19/2016 03:28 AM, Andrzej K wrote:
Or, in other words, when I decide to use a blocking call from
MessageConsumer::receive() is there a way to interrupt (or cancel) it form
another threa without killing the entire application?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.n
Hello,
I've got the solution and its explanation.
Each connection needs /a unique ClientID/ :
*connection.setClientID("clientID");*
My mistake was to understand this unicity for a given client.
When a client subscribes to a Topic, there is one connection for this Topic.
So, for a given client su
Or, in other words, when I decide to use a blocking call from
MessageConsumer::receive() is there a way to interrupt (or cancel) it form
another threa without killing the entire application?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Can-I-Receive-and-Disconnect-simu
