I found this article: http://www.evanjones.ca/java-bytebuffer-leak.html
I guess 5.10.2 uses 'Heap ByteBuffers' which is backed with unlimited
'temporary Direct ByteBuffer', while 5.13.3 uses 'Direct ByteBuffer'
directly?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/nio
We only ran 5.13.3 in production for several days and didn't see this issue.
But we saw another issue which we didn't see in 5.10.2:
Some old data file(2 days ago) is reserved because of some queue. But when I
check the queue in admin ui, I didn't see any old message. The new messsages
are in and
Thank you. Both EmbeddedExamples work!
For the sake of completeness :)
ConnectionFactoryConfiguration cfConfig = new
ConnectionFactoryConfigurationImpl().setName(
"cf").setConnectorNames(connectorNames).setBindings("cf");
and
JMSQueueConfiguration queueConfig = n
In the following example from
http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
failover:(tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616,tcp://remote:61616)?randomize=false&priorityBackup=true&priorityURIs=tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616
Will local1 always be tried before local2 or is the
Hi All,
Is there any please can you help me to configure ActiveMQ with Websphere
6.1 and jdk 1.5
Thanks,
Ram
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-with-Websphere-6-1-and-jdk-1-5-tp4712731.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Na
Is there a way to create two different roles 1) Admin users with full access
to console 2) Demo users with read only access to console[cant delete/create
Queues/Topics. Cant delete/purge messages etc] snippet from current
jetty.xml
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nab
I have also faced the same issue, but this issue seems to be resolved in
latest version of active mq, i have used 5.13.3 version, this issue does not
come in that.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/web-browser-issue-when-trying-to-view-a-messsage-tp4682847p4
Any one encounter this similar problem?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-message-flooding-tp4710656p4712712.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Below is my destination policy in which I have disabled producerFlowControl
but my producer still slows down (to the rate consumer is able to actually
handle).
Why does this happen even after disabling producerFlowControl, are these two
things not related?? What should i do to avoid this?
amq
This feels very familiar, like there was a bug fixed recently or a mailing
list conversion where someone else had the same problem. I've done some
quick searching both places and didn't find anything obvious. I keep
thinking I'll have some time to do a better search, but it hasn't happened;
sorry
based on your log, I think it should be passengerride.user.1234567890 which
prevents the deletion of #6
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-5-13-2-Kaha-DB-logs-cleanup-issue-tp4712046p4712707.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabbl
11 matches
Mail list logo