Re: Separate persistence provider per queue

What does it mean (to you) for a queue's persistence to be local or to be on a remote broker? Those phrases don't mean anything to me, so unless they mean something to someone else, your question's unlikely to get answered as it's currently written. Please clarify what you mean, and someone may b

Re: broker network replicated levelDB config problem

OK, so you need to figure out architecturally what you're looking for. An ActiveMQ message exists on only a single broker at a time. From a given broker, it can be forwarded to a consumer of the message, which might be an client or might be another broker that is "consuming" the message in order

Re: clustering architecture

It's not possible to have a quorum (i.e. > 50%) in all scenarios when you only have two groupings and both of them could disappear entirely. By definition, to have a quorum after the loss of one grouping, the lost grouping must be < 50% and the one that remains must be > 50%, so in the inverse sit

Re: ActiveMQ v6 Integration with Zookeeper

Artemis supports live-to-backup replication of persistent data over the network so a (replicated) SAN is not required for HA. Would that satisfy your use-case? Justin - Original Message - From: "barry barnett" To: users@activemq.apache.org, users@activemq.apache.org Sent: Monday, May

RE: ActiveMQ v6 Integration with Zookeeper

We are utilizing zookeeper to manage our backend persistent data store which alleviates the need for replicated SAN. Regards, Barry Barnett Enterprise Queuing Services | QS4U Cell: 803-207-7452 -Original Message- From: Justin Bertram [jbert...@apache.com]

Re: ActiveMQ v6 Integration with Zookeeper

It may be more helpful to have a discussion in terms of functionality rather than specific integration technology. What use-case is ZooKeeper currently facilitating for you with ActiveMQ 5.x? There may be equivalent functionality in ActiveMQ Artemis. Justin - Original Message - From

RE: ActiveMQ v6 Integration with Zookeeper

If we utilize ActiveMQ v5.13 with zookeeper then it would probably be best not to consider upgrading to Artemis until the ZK integration is added. Hopefully that will be an added function consideration. Regards, Barry Barnett Enterprise Queuing Services | QS4U Cell: 803-207-7452 -Origin

Re: ActiveMQ v6 Integration with Zookeeper

By "ActiveMQ v6" I assume you mean ActiveMQ Artemis which was based on the HornetQ code-base donated to Apache ActiveMQ... I don't know of any current or planned integration between ActiveMQ Artemis and Zookeeper. Justin - Original Message - From: "barry barnett" To: users@activemq.a

Separate persistence provider per queue

Is it possible to configure a broker to use a different persistence provider for a particular queue. The situation is that I have a bunch of queues whose persistence is on a remote broker but I want to have a vm queue whose persistence is local. If this is possible, a sample of how to do it would

Re: Send Message on Multicast URI not work

On 05/02/2016 08:19 AM, Ughes_80 wrote: Hi all, i want send a message with C++ API on a topic on multicast URI, but while in Java code i use the follow line code new ActiveMQConnectionFactory("discovery://(multicast://default)"), with URI discovery://(multicast://default), the same URI not wo

Re: broker network replicated levelDB config problem

Thank you very much. that's what I understood from the master / slave what I want to do is http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html But I always have a master / slave behavior A+JYT -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/broker-network-replicated-le

Send Message on Multicast URI not work

Hi all, i want send a message with C++ API on a topic on multicast URI, but while in Java code i use the follow line code new ActiveMQConnectionFactory("discovery://(multicast://default)"), with URI discovery://(multicast://default), the same URI not work with C++ code I tested with discovery:(m

ActiveMQ v6 Integration with Zookeeper

Is anyone aware if ActiveMQ v6 will have the ability to integrate with Zookeeper, being that it will function more like the HornetQ foundation in the new version?

Re: ActiveMQ Broker Camel Component and wildcards

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Quinn Stevenson < qu...@pronoia-solutions.com> wrote: > > > > MyHeaderValue > > > broker://${header[JMSDestination]} > > > ​I have a nearly identical route r

Re: Clarification of temp usage

Ok. Thank you. That explains the behaviour I´v seen... -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarification-of-temp-usage-tp4711305p4711422.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.