Re: ActiveMQ Object Message to json transformation not working

2016-03-30 Thread xabhi
How do I make sure that this class is available at broker side? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Object-Message-to-json-transformation-not-working-tp4709447p4710145.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Measures to improve the throughput

2016-03-30 Thread Frizz
In an atempt to improve the throughput of my system I did various tests. I started with a simple setup: - 1 Topic, non persistent - 1 Producer - 1 Consumer - Messge size: 4k - Active MQ 5.12.1 My system is reasonably fast (8 cores, 32GB memory, SSD) - still I only manage to send & receive about 45

Re: ActiveMQ with KahaDB as persistent store becomes very slow (almost unresponsive) after creating large no (25000+) of Topics

2016-03-30 Thread Shobhana
Hi Tim & Christopher, I tried with 5.13.2 version but as you suspected, it did not solve my problem. We don't have any wildcard subscriptions. Most of the Topics have a maximum of 8 subscriptions (Ranges between 2 and 8) and a few topics (~25-30 so far) have more than 8 (this is not fixed, it dep

Re: ActiveMQ with KahaDB as persistent store becomes very slow (almost unresponsive) after creating large no (25000+) of Topics

2016-03-30 Thread Tim Bain
AbstractRegion.lookup()

Re: ActiveMQ with KahaDB as persistent store becomes very slow (almost unresponsive) after creating large no (25000+) of Topics

2016-03-30 Thread Christopher Shannon
Also, the bug fix should at least help the performance on start up but may not help with the producer timing out problem. The main issue is that the message has to be dispatched to all subscriptions before the ACK can be sent back to the producer, so if you have a lot of subscriptions (such as a w

Re: activemq-all jar tight coupling with log4j

2016-03-30 Thread Christopher Shannon
I didn't realize that config was added recently (looks like 5.12.0). It also looks like the dependency jcl-over-slf4j was added as part of that commit as well so not sure if that is also causing you problems. I'm not entirely sure why it was just added (probably just to make it easy to provide fo