Error while master boots up

Hi All, I am new to Artemis and trying to setup simple master/slave setup with static connectors. I have followed static connector example to setup config. But, when I try to bring up the cluster I am getting an error in master node. Slave is coming up successfully without any issue. Not sure

Re: Messages dequeued but not consumed

My suggestion to use JConsole to see if you have (only) the consumers you expect and my question about whether messages might be expiring both still stand. Tim On Feb 10, 2016 1:23 PM, "mhemple" wrote: > I added more ActiveMQ configuration information. Please let me know if I > am > missing som

Re: Unable to consume all messages from the existing connection

On 02/10/2016 04:53 PM, Ramababu Bendalam wrote: > HI Tim, > > Thank you for your reply. I have tried using pooled connections, but i do > not find any option to get the existing connections. If you have any code > related to that can you share it. Also please let me know how to use the > reference

Re: Unable to consume all messages from the existing connection

HI Tim, Thank you for your reply. I have tried using pooled connections, but i do not find any option to get the existing connections. If you have any code related to that can you share it. Also please let me know how to use the reference of the existing connection using code. -- View this mess

Re: Unable to consume all messages from the existing connection

On 02/10/2016 04:01 PM, Tim Bain wrote: > If you have a reference to an existing Connection and you want to reuse it, > just use that instead of calling connectionFactory.createConnection() to > create a new connection (as stated right in the method name). Nothing > requires you to create a new Co

Re: Unable to consume all messages from the existing connection

If you have a reference to an existing Connection and you want to reuse it, just use that instead of calling connectionFactory.createConnection() to create a new connection (as stated right in the method name). Nothing requires you to create a new Connection if you already have one that will meet

Re: Question re Jetty and ActiveMQ 5.13.0 async support

Never mind, it appears the problem was due to how the install was run, there was another section that was overriding the web.xml using an older version, not the one distributed with 5.13.0. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:47 PM James A. Robinson wrote: > I'm working on upgrading from activemq 5.11.0 t

Question re Jetty and ActiveMQ 5.13.0 async support

I'm working on upgrading from activemq 5.11.0 to 5.13.0. When I make an HTTP GET request against the older version of the service, when the queue doesn't have any pending messages, the request hangs until one is ready. On the newer version it returns a fatal status 500 error and throws an exceptio

Re: Messages dequeued but not consumed

I added more ActiveMQ configuration information. Please let me know if I am missing something. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-dequeued-but-not-consumed-tp4707380p4707395.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: request-reply broken on duplex network (5.12.1) ?

Be interested to see if it works if you remove the dynamicallyIncludedDestinations ? > On 10 Feb 2016, at 19:23, felixehm wrote: > > Hi, > > before opening an issue, here's what we have encountered on our production > system: > > Scenario: > Given two brokers A and B in a dynamic network > (h

Re: request-reply broken on dynamic duplex network (5.12.1) ?

In case somebody is interested, I can send a unit test. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/request-reply-broken-on-dynamic-duplex-network-5-12-1-tp4707392p4707393.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

request-reply broken on duplex network (5.12.1) ?

Hi, before opening an issue, here's what we have encountered on our production system: Scenario: Given two brokers A and B in a dynamic network (http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html). The bridge is configured on broker B and works in both directions (duplex) . {code}

java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded

Hi All, I am having java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded Error after a while from starting the ActiveMQ on my system (2-3 weeks) start seeing this issue on production. i had to restart the my ActiveMQ every while on production so i might lose some messages coming in the time whi

Re: Unable to consume all messages from the existing connection

Connection connection; Destination queue; Consumer consumer; ActiveMQConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory("tcp://:61616"); connection = connectionFactory.createConnection(); connection.start(); session = connection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE); cons

Re: Messages dequeued but not consumed

Thanks for the reply. Yes I looked into Artemis but my boss wants to go with vanilla activeMQ. Yes the issue is with ActiveMQ... when I run with HornetQ my messages are consumed as expected. My goal here is to figure out why messages from one queue are not being consumed. I apologize for the

Re: Standalone ActiveMQ address settings

"Currently my DLQ and Expirery Queue are not working correctly." We can only help you fix the problem if you tell us what the problem is... On Feb 9, 2016 10:58 AM, "mhemple" wrote: > Okay I see I was looking at an at an ActiveMQ/Artimus guide. I guess that > wont work. What I'm trying to do i

Re: How fileCursor works? AMQ5.9.1

Which messages do you lose when the topic becomes full? Does the broker discard the just-received message or the earliest non-dispatched message? On Feb 10, 2016 3:54 AM, "Gary Tully" wrote: > any chance persistent=false is set on the broker? post your full xml config > and peek at the unit test

Re: How fileCursor works? AMQ5.9.1

any chance persistent=false is set on the broker? post your full xml config and peek at the unit test source for flow controll of memory limit tests to get working examples On Thu 4 Feb 2016 4:21 AM fengcanyue <153133...@qq.com> wrote: >