Re: ActiveMQ SSL implementation

Good finding - I commented on the Jira ticket. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-SSL-implementation-tp4706285p4706423.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reject an incoming message from Camel

Note, by the way, that asyncSend=false only affects the send from the producer to the broker - not from the broker to the consumer. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Reject-an-incoming-message-from-Camel-broker-component-tp4706168p4706422.html Sent from the

Re: Reject an incoming message from Camel

There is no way to notify a message producer if consumption of the message fails through JMS semantics. That defeats the major aspect of JMS - asynchronous processing and loose coupling of producers and consumers. In order to inform the producer of success or failure, one of the following would d

Re: [Artemis] Any plans for Artemis Support for OSGI

It should already work. In Apache Karaf you can install artemis using these commands: feature:repo-add artemis 1.2.0 feature:install artemis-core artemis-amqp artemis-hornetq artemis-mqtt artemis-stomp This will install all the transports. You can then configure artemis using etc/artemis.xml

Re: Message Group Limitations (how many simulataneous groups are supported?)

The default Message Group Map implementation was recently changed to use an LRU Cache of message groups. Here's the issue with message groups - the broker does not know the set of message group IDs ahead of time and must allow for any number of group IDs to be used. If the total set of possible m

Re: Message Group Limitations (how many simulataneous groups are supported?)

The default limit is indeed 1024 message groups per destination. However you increase that by adding the following configuration to your broker's activemq.xml: In addition to cachedMessageGroupMessageFactory (default) there's also the

Message Group Limitations (how many simulataneous groups are supported?)

Hello, We are investigating using message groups as a technique to insure "in order" processing of various IDs. In the past (2010), I have found posts mentioning that more than 1024 message groups will trigger an overflow for the default implementations. http://scott.cranton.com/2010/09/acti

Re: [Artemis] Any plans for Artemis Support for OSGI

also, notice this is version specific: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/1.2.0/docs/user-manual/en/karaf.md (We will actually need to verify how to parameterize current version on gitbooks ).. (Or maybe we just make the text generic such as: feature:repo-add mvn:org.apache.ac

Re: [Artemis] Any plans for Artemis Support for OSGI

this got written, but I believe it's missing a link on the main .md.. https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/docs/user-manual/en/karaf.md On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Justin Bertram wrote: > I'm not familiar with all the details, but my understanding is that there's > ba

Re: [Artemis] Any plans for Artemis Support for OSGI

I'm not familiar with all the details, but my understanding is that there's basic OSGI support available. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-93 for more details on that. Perhaps Christian could elaborate more on what specifically is supported. Justin - Original Message --

[Artemis] Any plans for Artemis Support for OSGI

Hi, Just wanted to know of any plans Artemis has to release support for OSGI? Is anyone already using it within OSGI containers ? Regards, -Yogesh -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-Any-plans-for-Artemis-Support-for-OSGI-tp4706368.html Sent from th

Re: ActiveMQ SSL implementation

Managed to get around this issue, so now ActiveMQ starts ok when Java is enabled for FIPS mode using NSS. See ActiveMQ JIRA case... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5100 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-SSL-implementation-tp4706285p47064

Re: Cluster/Federated Artemis problems

The documentation is pretty clear (IMO) about the purpose of the "address" property of the cluster connection. There's nothing "magic" about it. In short, "Each cluster connection only applies to addresses that match the specified address field. An address is matched on the cluster connection

Re: Cluster/Federated Artemis problems

Your help is appreciated, and effective. I have misunderstood the configuration elements. I was not clear that the acceptor and the connector describe the same end-point. After fixing that I saw a few logging messages about bridges being built. The configuration help that you pointed me to s

Re: [ActiveMQ] Spring 4.1.8 support in ActiveMQ Karaf

No problem, I'm hoping to release 5.13.1 pretty soon (maybe this week) so keep an eye out for it. On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:45 PM, yogu13 wrote: > I see its done... Thanks Chris! > > Regards, > -Yogesh > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-S

Re: Cluster/Federated Artemis problems

I imagine this is just a configuration issue somewhere. We ship lots of examples which use clustering (although not embedded), and the test-suite is full of embedded clustering tests. As far as I know all these are working properly. When you say the NettyAcceptor and NettyConnector use a "ran

Re: ActiveMQ SSL implementation

So I had a go at trying to do this. I have followed the online guides on how to get NSS working with Java SE (running on windows), and have managed to get Java to work ok with NSS. I have configured the sslContext to point to the NSS DB, and set the store types as PKCS11. However when starting u

Cluster/Federated Artemis problems

Hello group members. I'm having problems with clustering/federating an application's Artemis embedded server. The application is a .WAR with Springframework 4 and Embedded Artemis 1.1.0 (from Spring). Multiple instances of the application are expected to be deployed in multiple spots. The