Do you see the same performance impact from attaching JConsole or JVisualVM?
On Nov 10, 2015 4:09 PM, "Basmajian, Raffi"
wrote:
> I'm throwing a hail mary on this one,
>
> We've set up a broker cluster on A-MQ 5.11 (Fuse 6.2).
> Six master/slave pairs, full graph topology network of brokers; 12 b
> （sorry，i‘m not good at english）
speak in Java then ;), show an example and the exception or error
that's happening.
Also include the version of ActiveMQ where this is happening.
hi everyone
i subscribe and unsubscribe topic in activemq by
mqttconnection（durable）many times。a problem occur。
when i subscribe the topic i received the message that created before i
subscribed。
（sorry，i‘m not good at english）
thank you inadvance
--
View this message in context:
http://ac
Hi there,
a question related to message groups: is it possible to rebalance message
groups when a new consumer registers with the broker?
In my setup I have two consumers that consume from the same queue where all
messages have a message group ID. If one consumer loses connection all
messages go t
I do not know if there is an existing thread on this subject but
-What is the difference between Active MQ and Apache ActiveMQ Artemis
It is possible that Artemis will eventually become the successor to ActiveMQ
5.x (and that it might eventually be branded as ActiveMQ 6.x), but no
decision about t
I'm throwing a hail mary on this one,
We've set up a broker cluster on A-MQ 5.11 (Fuse 6.2).
Six master/slave pairs, full graph topology network of brokers; 12 brokers
total.
The cluster is brand new, no message activity; network connectors are active
and working properly.
Java 8, RHEL 7.1, 1gb/
Thanks for reaching out Tim.
I would prefer not to use Kerberos right now but I have no examples to
follow.
I'm just want to get something running so I can run some fail-over tests.
I tried the link but looks like I would have to install Kerberos Servers
etc.
I'll reach out to the zookeeper mail
I forgot to mention that the copy of the message will be off by default.
As of 5.12.0, you can enable the advisory message to contain a copy of the
original message by setting the includeBodyForAdvisory property to true on
the destination policy or default policy that is used. This option is
descr
Yes, you can listen to the advisory messages for DLQ'd messages. An
advisory will be sent when a message is moved to DLQ and the advisory will
contain a copy of the message.
The advisory topics to listen on are ActiveMQ.Advisory.MessageDLQd.Queue
and ActiveMQ.Advisory.MessageDLQd.Topic
Take a lo
if that's the case you could do the same with Bridges, Cluster
Connections and Diverts on Artemis as well.
Regardless of being AMQ5 or Artemis, I don't fully understand what
he's describing.. sounds a consulting gig to me to gather abstract
requirements and implement them. I would need some simp
The fact that some destinations should always be routed to C makes me think
a full datacenter failover isn't being requested anyway. The goal is not
for C to take over for B, the goal is for C to take over the receipt and
processing of select destinations from B. Those are different scenarios.
I
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:02 PM, jahlborn wrote:
> So I've spent some time digging around the internet and experimenting with
> our
> setup, trying to determine the best configuration for a network of brokers.
> There are a variety of things which seem to conspire against me: the
> multitude
> of
Hi everyone,
I just started to work with ActiveMQ, Camel and Enterprise Integration
Pattern.
To ensure reliability I configured my ActiveMQ Broker under Jms Transaction
with redelivery policy inside of message routing with Apache Camel.
Redelivery policy works fine, indeed after 3 attempts with a
There are ways you could somehow achieve that with Artemis as well...
but even with AMQ, it sounds like this is not fully a Datacenter
failover implementation with proper tests. That to me sounds a feature
request to either AMQ5 or Artemis.
The network connection will forward messages to the other
We have a working amq 5.9.1 with an oracle data store
when trying to upgrade to am1 5.12.1 we get the following error on startup
Is there a way I can fix this
Error:
2015-11-10 11:07:54,050 | INFO | Refreshing
org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerFactory$1@5034c75a: startup date [Tue
Nov 10 11
I know you're also looking at Artemis, but if ActiveMQ can meet your other
requirements, it can fulfill the routing scenario you described.
You would need two networkConnectors. One would be for the queues and
topics that should always go straight to C, with a URI like
static:(failover:(tcp://C1,
anyone have any insights?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Correctly-configuring-a-network-of-brokers-tp4703715p4703803.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Unfortunately the mailing list doesn't have an active LevelDB expert; when
people ask LevelDB questions, they generally go unanswered.
In this case, it's possible I might be able to help. Looking at your first
error message, it appears to be a Kerberos error, and I see what looks like
a Kerberos
hi,
sometimes a client tries to connect to the ActiveMQ and the connect failed.
I use "failover:(ssl://...)" for an automatic reconnect.
The Client uses the .NET NMS library and it seems that the client does
hundrets of reconnects in a very short time.
lsof -n -P -i | grep 51617 | wc -l show
Thanks for your answer.
The message conversion scenario is trivial. Shorter scenario is that:
Site A produces a message X and sends it to site B.
If all of the clusters on site B fail, site A will send the message to site
C.
My scenario looks like B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3 are backup servers in that ord
20 matches
Mail list logo
