Hi
I have a server program and several client programs
These programs run concurrently
I wish to use ActiveMQ to send simple messages back and forth as follows:-
1) at a certain point each client sends new data to the server
2) once the server has received new data from each and every client, it
Isn't usePrefetchExtension=false the same as queuePrefetch=0 and
topicPrefetch=0 via policies? I always thought they were just two ways
(and not the only two, because you can set it per-connection factory or per
destination) to do the same thing. Or am I missing something here?
On Oct 22, 2015 1:
On 10/22/2015 05:32 PM, Martin Lichtin wrote:
> Right, but the JMX "JobScheduler" MBean shows no jobs at all (the
> 'AllJobs' attribute is empty).
> It also shows NextScheduleTime=1970-01-01 00:59:59.
>
> Turning on tracing, it shows:
>
> 2015-10-22 12:33:18,502 | TRACE | heckpoint Worker |
> JobSc
Right, but the JMX "JobScheduler" MBean shows no jobs at all (the 'AllJobs'
attribute is empty).
It also shows NextScheduleTime=1970-01-01 00:59:59.
Turning on tracing, it shows:
2015-10-22 12:33:18,502 | TRACE | heckpoint Worker | JobSchedulerStoreImpl |
105 - org.apache.activemq.activemq-osg
About JMSActiveMQBrokerOutTime, as redelivery is typically done locally by the
client/consumer, it will not change.
I imagine it should get updated in case of a server-side redelivery though.
On 19.10.2015 06:18, Tim Bain wrote:
I'm pretty sure the JMS spec describes how JMSTimestamp is handled
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Mihkel Nõges
wrote:
> Hi Martyn, Clebert,
>
> Thanks for fixing it and for good suggestions! I think the best way still
> is to not use failback in production at all and instead change the master
> configuration to be slave after the master crashes or is stopped an
Your problem sounds a bit more complex, but just wanted to mentioned that one
can set usePrefetchExtension=”false”.
From the docs:
The default behavior of a broker is to use delivery acknowledgements to
determine the state of a consumer's prefetch buffer. For example, if a
consumer's prefetch
On 10/22/2015 09:54 AM, barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> If I'm using JConsole, where would I see it in that GUI?
>
> Regards,
>
> Barry Barnett
> Enterprise Queuing Services | (QS4U) Open Queuing Services
> Wells Fargo
> Cell: 803-207-7452
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Timothy Bish
If I'm using JConsole, where would I see it in that GUI?
Regards,
Barry Barnett
Enterprise Queuing Services | (QS4U) Open Queuing Services
Wells Fargo
Cell: 803-207-7452
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Bish [mailto:tabish...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 9:47 AM
To: user
On 10/22/2015 04:46 AM, Martin Lichtin wrote:
> Can you help me understand what is stored in the "scheduler" directory?
> I see about 14G of db-xxx.log files sitting there.
>
> All queues are empty and also the kahadb directory contains just one
> db-nnn.log file.
>
> schedulerSupport is enabled o
In your example of 100 consumers, I would expect that when a message is
received 100 ack rows would be inserted (ideally in a single transaction),
and when each consumer receives its copy of the message one row would be
updated (so when they all have finally received it, you'll have done 100
update
Thanks, Tim!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Tim Bain
Date: 10/22/2015 12:57 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: ActiveMQ Users
Subject: Re: GC Overhead limit exceeded? [ EXTERNAL ]
That was the best part: after spending a bunch of time tweaking lots
Can you help me understand what is stored in the "scheduler" directory?
I see about 14G of db-xxx.log files sitting there.
All queues are empty and also the kahadb directory contains just one db-nnn.log
file.
schedulerSupport is enabled only due to use of the redelivery plugin.
I'm pretty puzzl
Hi Martyn, Clebert,
Thanks for fixing it and for good suggestions! I think the best way still
is to not use failback in production at all and instead change the master
configuration to be slave after the master crashes or is stopped and needs
to be restarted. I guess this is the more safer way of
14 matches
Mail list logo