I believe that the discarded message count in JMX is incremented (and so
I'd expect an advisory message to be generated, though I've never looked
for one to confirm that) when a message expires while still on the broker.
(I believe I've observed that if the message expires after being dispatched
to
I am trying to do some Jmeter performance testing of activeMQ as described
here:
http://activemq.apache.org/jmeter-performance-tests.html
However, all the activemq-jmeter-*.zip distributions linked there are for
version 4 and earlier. Are these tests not available for more recent version
of activ
I am able to reproduce this issue by restarting the broker, when camel
consumers are sending those millions of messages on the queue.
I am planning to set recoveryInterval on the camel JmsConfiguration, please
post your views on this.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4
Are composite destinations supported for all types of clients, not just
JMS/Java?
For example, is it possible for HTTP client to send a message to three queues
at once?
curl -d "body=message" http://mqhost/api/message/TEST1,TEST2,TEST3?type=queue
This e-mail transmission may contain informati
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:03:10 -0400, Timothy Bish
wrote:
>On 10/09/2015 10:56 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:49:51 -0400, Timothy Bish
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/09/2015 10:37 AM, spamtrap wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:34:17 +0100, spamtrap
wrote:
> ActiveMQ-CPP 3.9.0
On 10/09/2015 10:56 AM, spamtrap wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:49:51 -0400, Timothy Bish
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/09/2015 10:37 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:34:17 +0100, spamtrap
>>> wrote:
>>>
ActiveMQ-CPP 3.9.0
A program is blocking waiting for a lock:
#0
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:49:51 -0400, Timothy Bish
wrote:
>On 10/09/2015 10:37 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:34:17 +0100, spamtrap
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ActiveMQ-CPP 3.9.0
>>>
>>> A program is blocking waiting for a lock:
>>>
>>> #0 0x00367980b5bc in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (
On 10/09/2015 10:37 AM, spamtrap wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:34:17 +0100, spamtrap
> wrote:
>
>> ActiveMQ-CPP 3.9.0
>>
>> A program is blocking waiting for a lock:
>>
>> #0 0x00367980b5bc in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 ()
>> from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
>> #1 0x7fcab6c6c006 in (a
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:34:17 +0100, spamtrap
wrote:
>ActiveMQ-CPP 3.9.0
>
>A program is blocking waiting for a lock:
>
>#0 0x00367980b5bc in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 ()
> from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
>#1 0x7fcab6c6c006 in (anonymous namespace)::doMonitorEnter (
>monitor=0x26f
Hi Andy
I think I am trying to use activeMQ as the workmanager here. My consumers
are MDBs, so I can control the pool size via tomee.xml and the
transactional nature of JMS is exactly what I was counting with. If a
message delivery fails, then it automatically returns to the queue (because
it's wa
Ouch, I'll try and point you in a better direction. A message consumer should
never block longer than at maximum a few seconds, else you are going to starve
the pool in no time. You should only be checking that the message payload is
valid. If you need a long running task then hand the message o
I'm using the latest AMQ-5.12.0, trying to recover messages which failed
enough times to be moved to the DLQ. Invoking the retryMessage(messageId)
and retryMessages() operations from JMX results that if the consumer fails
again to consume, the message disappears completely and is being lost.
I sa
We are using ActiveMQ 5.10 broker with following configuration
JVM heap 48G out of which 70% allocated for memoryUsage
70G storage and 1G for temp
we are using Apache camel 2.10.2 route to consume messages from queue. After
receiving message, we create ~40k smaller messages/ received message and
advisory code:
Destination destination =session.createQueue("test");
Destination advisoryDestination =
AdvisorySupport.getMessageDiscardedAdvisoryTopic(destination);
MessageConsumer consumer = session.createConsumer(advisoryDestination);
consumer.setMessageListener(new MessageListen
If you want redelivery to other consumers rather than just the one to which
the message was first delivered (which is how I interpreted your paragraph
about message-driven beans) and you can live with out-of-order delivery,
I'd think you'd want to configure broker redelivery as described at the
bot
When you restarted the broker after reconfiguring it, did you remember to
set the environment variable to the new encryption password?
On Oct 8, 2015 8:36 AM, "rosy.sal...@murex.com"
wrote:
> I'm using activemq 5.11.1. I applied password encryption using the
> following
> url: http://activemq.apa
Do you have a procedure that will reliably reproduce both problems you
describe (negative consumer counts and non-delivery of messages) each time
you run it?
Have you used a JMX viewer such as JConsole to examine the subscriptions on
each destination both when the broker is in a good state and whe
17 matches
Mail list logo
