Have you done the producerless test I described earlier?
On Oct 1, 2015 8:38 AM, wrote:
> Could this be an issue?
>
> BrokerA is where the consumer listens for the message.
>
> BrokerB is where the message is placed on the TEST queue.
>
> When the client app connects to BrokerA to listen, the MDB
You might be able to use Camel routes embedded in the broker to move
messages from each topic into a single new queue. That would preserve
message ordering even when the consumer is disconnected.
Note that I've never used embedded Camel routes, so I can't say for sure
that the approach would work
Great, thank you!
On Oct 1, 2015 11:01 AM, "gijsbert802" wrote:
> Thanks Tim.
>
> I created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5995
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-exits-on-startup-with-UTFDataFormatException-bad-strin
On 01.10.2015 16:48, Jim Gomes wrote:
You're welcome. You can use the NMS libraries from PowerShell. I've done it
many times for writing test scripts and other things. It's actually quite
easy. If you want some sample code, let me know. You can then take that
into a full C# app with little diffic
First off, there are no ordering guarantees for messages across more than one
destination.
The closest to a workable solution I believe you'll find for needing to
serialize the work from messages across multiple destinations, without some
form of internal queueing in the application, would involve
Apparently it is standard EJB behavior to create the queue when the client
connects to listen on the broker. If this is the case,
Application A connects to Broker A to consumer messages from TEST queue.
TEST queue has been defined on Broker B and has a message on it.
Application A will not con
Thanks Tim.
I created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5995
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-exits-on-startup-with-UTFDataFormatException-bad-string-tp4701955p4702535.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at N
Could this be an issue?
BrokerA is where the consumer listens for the message.
BrokerB is where the message is placed on the TEST queue.
When the client app connects to BrokerA to listen, the MDB automatically
creates the TEST queue on BrokerA and listens there.
So the message on BrokerB TES
Stop testing with a producer; it's completely irrelevant. Messages
traverse a network of brokers because they are pulled by consumers, not
because they are pushed by producers. So everything you need to know about
the operation of a network of brokers can be determined by examining the
interaction
So the client connected to brokerB and put a message, but this created a queue
called TEST as well. Now we have queue TEST on broker A and queue TEST on
brokerB as well. So the listener on BrokerA is listening to TEST queue on
BrokerA, and no one is listening to TEST queue on BrokerB. Do I ne
You're welcome. You can use the NMS libraries from PowerShell. I've done it
many times for writing test scripts and other things. It's actually quite
easy. If you want some sample code, let me know. You can then take that
into a full C# app with little difficulty.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015, 12:05 AM Jar
On Oct 1, 2015 7:02 AM, wrote:
>
> Have you disabled advisory messages and/or explicitly included/excluded
any destinations?
> I have added nothing in the activemq.xml file to exclude advisory
messages, etc.
>
> And have you done anything to prevent the broker from auto-creating
destinations?
> A
BTW, I'm not convinced that a different network topology will avoid the
exception you first asked about. Someone who knows XA transactions (which
is not me, sorry) needs to look at that.
On Oct 1, 2015 7:06 AM, "Tim Bain" wrote:
> A network of brokers can be used for HA as long as the network to
A network of brokers can be used for HA as long as the network topology
will remain fully connected in the face of N failures (for whatever value
of N you choose to support, probably 1) and the clients' failover URIs will
always contain a live broker in the face of the same failure(s).
But you cou
Have you disabled advisory messages and/or explicitly included/excluded any
destinations?
I have added nothing in the activemq.xml file to exclude advisory messages, etc.
And have you done anything to prevent the broker from auto-creating
destinations?
Again, nothing added to the activemq.xml
Your assumption is correct, networks of brokers allow messages to be
forwarded across the network to be consumed by consumers on brokers other
than the one on which the message was produced.
Have you disabled advisory messages and/or explicitly included/excluded any
destinations? And have you don
BrokerA
BrokerB
Client application A dynamically creates queue called TEST on BrokerB and puts
a message there. Client application B connectos to BrokerA and tries to read
queue TEST. I'll have to ask the client to provide me the code.
Regards,
Barr
Post your config and client code, otherwise, we're shooting in the dark :-)
-Original Message-
From: barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com [mailto:barry.barn...@wellsfargo.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 7:58 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: RE: Network of Brokers - Putting/Getting
Here's the issue we are having:
Broker ABroker B
Network Connector to Broker B Network
Connector to Broker A
(Broker A discovers Network Connector in Log) (Broker
B discove
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:01:15 -0400, Timothy Bish
wrote:
>On 09/25/2015 11:44 AM, spamtrap wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:34:56 -0400, Timothy Bish
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/25/2015 11:29 AM, spamtrap wrote:
If you set the message priority with cms::Message::setPriority() and
then send t
> From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain
> Sent: 30. syyskuuta 2015 15:42
> To: ActiveMQ Users
> Subject: Re: ActiveMQ and the Windows world
>
> Most people on both Windows and Linux use the Java or C++ client libraries
> to read and write messages from/to ActiveM
21 matches
Mail list logo
